The bill passed its first reading 74–49; the vote was not unanimous. According to the bill’s explanatory material, international transfer costs can be opaque, with exchange-rate margins acting as hidden fees, particularly affecting migrants and others who send money overseas regularly. The bill aims to make the full cost of international money transfers visible before customers initiate a transaction. The bill would require financial institutions’ fair conduct programmes to ensure customers transferring New Zealand dollars overseas can identify the total cost, including fees and rates, before transferring. At minimum, the full fee must be prominently displayed where and when the service is provided; regulations could set display requirements.
AI-assisted summary based on the bill text and linked Hansard debates.
AI-assisted summary of the linked Hansard debates. Each point is grounded in the cited transcript.
Arguments for
Migrant and Pacific remitters would be able to compare the real cost of transfers because the bill would expose exchange-rate spreads now presented as zero-fee offers, preventing recipients from receiving unexpectedly less money.
Low-income migrant workers making small, frequent transfers would face fewer avoidable charges because upfront disclosure would make opaque fees visible before they transact.
Consumers would receive the advertised rather than a later-discovered transfer price because the bill would require fees that can reach 10 percent to be disclosed upfront.
International-transfer users, including migrant workers and New Zealand businesses, could pay higher fees because providers would need extra staff and compliance work to supply the mandated cost breakdowns.
The bill would impose costs without improving the outcomes remitters value—transfer safety, speed, or price—because it only requires disclosure of cost components.
Government should not add this disclosure legislation because existing financial-institution regimes already require fair and transparent consumer treatment, making the bill duplicative bureaucracy.
Consumers’ transfer costs can be reduced through competition from technology firms rather than regulation, because fintechs enable international transfers at next to nothing.
Both sides recognised that differential remittance rates are a genuine problem for people sending money abroad; their disagreement was whether this bill is the appropriate Government response.
The claimed harm is especially concentrated among people who use English as a second language and work multiple jobs, because they may be less able to navigate alternatives to misleading zero-fee advertising.
Financial Markets (International Money Transfers) Amendment Bill
Version published May 22, 2025 00:00.
Financial Markets (International Money Transfers) Amendment Bill EXPLANATORY NOTE GENERAL POLICY STATEMENT New Zealanders pay more for international money transfers than people in Australia, the UK, and the USA. The Commerce Commission has found that the fees charged to New Zealand consumers were opaque and poorly understood. This is an issue for almost every Kiwi who will make an international money transfer or make a purchase online in a foreign currency. It is a particular issue for Pacific and other migrants that use international money transfer services very frequently to send money back home overseas, and as such they have a special need for price and fee transparency in this process. Banks charge a higher rate for acquiring (and therefore sending) international currencies than the prevailing mid-market rate in order to extract profit, and this effectively constitutes a ‘hidden fee’ when consumers want to make international money transfers through their bank. Because immigrant and diaspora communities use these services more frequently, they are more vulnerable to these hidden fees. This bill amends the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. It will require greater transparency…
Read full bill text
Financial Markets (International Money Transfers) Amendment Bill
EXPLANATORY NOTE
GENERAL POLICY STATEMENT
New Zealanders pay more for international money transfers than people in Australia, the UK, and the USA. The Commerce Commission has found that the fees charged to New Zealand consumers were opaque and poorly understood.
This is an issue for almost every Kiwi who will make an international money transfer or make a purchase online in a foreign currency. It is a particular issue for Pacific and other migrants that use international money transfer services very frequently to send money back home overseas, and as such they have a special need for price and fee transparency in this process. Banks charge a higher rate for acquiring (and therefore sending) international currencies than the prevailing mid-market rate in order to extract profit, and this effectively constitutes a ‘hidden fee’ when consumers want to make international money transfers through their bank. Because immigrant and diaspora communities use these services more frequently, they are more vulnerable to these hidden fees.
This bill amends the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. It will require greater transparency for fees charged on international money transfer services by:
requiring fair conduct programmes to include effective policies, processes, systems, and controls to ensure disclosure of international money transfer fees; providing for regulations to be made prescribing specific disclosure requirements for fees and charges for international money transfer services, including how information must be displayed at premises or on a webpage (if the transfer is made electronically on-line).
CLAUSE BY CLAUSE ANALYSIS
Clause 1 is the Title clause.
Clause 2 is the commencement clause and provides for the Bill to come into force on the day after Royal assent.
Clause 3 identifies the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 ( the Act ) as the Act amended by the Bill.
Clause 4 amends section 6 of the Act to insert a new definition of international money transfer service.
Clause 5 amends section 446J of the Act (Minimum requirements for fair conduct programme), to clarify the requirements in subsection (1)(j) regarding communicating with consumers about the financial institution’s relevant services or associated products. It also inserts new section 446J(1)(ja) to require that a fair conduct programme must include effective policies, processes, systems, and controls for ensuring that customers using international money transfer services are provided with sufficient information to be able to determine the total cost of a transaction, inclusive of all fees and rates prior to the transaction being initiated, and at a minimum provide for the entire fee for an international money transfer service to be prominently displayed at the time and place the service is provided.
Clause 6 amends section 546 of the Act, which is a regulation-making power, to provide for regulations to be made to prescribe how and where information about international money transfer services must be provided.
The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows:
1 Title
This Act is the Financial Markets (International Money Transfers) Amendment Act 2025 .
2 Commencement
This Act comes into force on the day after Royal assent.
3 Principal Act
This Act amends the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013.
4 Section 6 amended (Interpretation)
In section 6(1), insert the following definition in its appropriate alphabetical order: international money transfer service means the transfer of money from a person in New Zealand to an overseas recipient where, as part of the service, money is converted from New Zealand dollars to another currency
5 Section 446J amended (Minimum requirements for fair conduct programme)
Replace section 446J(1)(j) with: j communicating with consumers about the financial institution’s relevant services or associated products in a timely, clear, concise, and effective manner, including by— i having in place a framework for engaging with consumers to ensure the suitability of products and services, including on an ongoing-basis; and ii establishing systems and controls to achieve good consumer outcomes, including providing informative updates about changes to products and services; and iii ensuring that information about fees, charges, commissions, interest, or premiums that are connected with a product or service is fully disclosed to a consumer before that fee or charge is incurred; and ja in respect of international money transfer services, ensuring that— i consumers are provided with sufficient information to be able to determine the total cost of a transaction, inclusive of all fees and rates, prior to the transaction being initiated; and ii at a minimum, the entire fee charged for international money transfer services is displayed in a prominent location at the time and in the place that the services are provided; and
6 Section 546 amended (Regulations for purposes of Part 6 (market services))
After section 546(1)(oa)(vi), insert: via how and where information about costs associated with international money transfer services must be displayed, including how fees and rates are specified:
Hansard
May 12, 2026
Financial Markets (International Money Transfers) Amendment Bill
· Full day report
Financial Markets (International Money Transfers) Amendment Bill SPEAKER (14:55): Further, on 29 April, when the House was considering the Financial Markets (International Money Transfers) Amendment Bill, the result of the vote on the question that the bill be now read a first time was incorrectly recorded as Ayes 54, Noes 49. The correct result should have been Ayes 74, Noes 49. We will take a 30-second break for those who have to go to other business to leave the House before I call Government order of the day No. 1. Members should leave the House quietly and without any conversation on the way—all members, all members. Bills
Read full Hansard debate
Financial Markets (International Money Transfers) Amendment Bill
SPEAKER (14:55): Further, on 29 April, when the House was considering the Financial Markets (International Money Transfers) Amendment Bill, the result of the vote on the question that the bill be now read a first time was incorrectly recorded as Ayes 54, Noes 49. The correct result should have been Ayes 74, Noes 49.
We will take a 30-second break for those who have to go to other business to leave the House before I call Government order of the day No. 1.
Members should leave the House quietly and without any conversation on the way—all members, all members.
Bills