The bill passed its first reading by voice vote; no party or individual counts were recorded. According to the bill’s explanatory material, sexually explicit deepfakes can use a person’s recognisable likeness without consent, causing reputational, psychological, and material harm. The bill aims to make non-consensual synthetic intimate imagery subject to existing criminal and harmful-digital-communications rules, so affected people can seek redress and removal. The bill expands “intimate visual recording” in the Crimes Act 1961 and Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 to include created, synthesised, or altered images that appear to show a person in specified intimate situations without their knowledge or consent.
AI-assisted summary based on the bill text and linked Hansard debates.
Latest voting result
May 20, 2026
First reading: PassedVoice vote
Decision recorded by voice vote; no individual or party counts were recorded.
AI-assisted summary of the linked Hansard debates. Each point is grounded in the cited transcript.
Arguments for
By extending the law to synthetic and AI-generated intimate images, the bill would let police investigate creators and hold them accountable rather than leaving victims in an exploited legislative gap.
Making non-consensual fake intimate recordings an offence would empower affected people and enable offenders who create or distribute them to be held to account.
Deepfake Digital Harm and Exploitation Bill EXPLANATORY NOTE GENERAL POLICY STATEMENT Worldwide there has been a rise in the proliferation of sexually explicit deepfakes. This is where images or videos are digitally altered or synthesised to take an individual's recognisable likeness and turn it into sexually explicit material. This form of material constitutes a clear violation of self-ownership and personal autonomy. Just as the unauthorised sharing of genuine intimate imagery is a rights infringement, so too is the false representation of a person in intimate contexts without consent. This conduct misappropriates a person's image for exploitative purposes, causing reputational, psychological, and often material harm. Criminalising such acts and enabling victims to seek redress and removal aligns with a commitment to defending individuals from coercion, fraud, and aggression. This Bill holds accountable those who use digital tools to violate other individuals' agency. It does this by amending both the Crimes Act 1961 and the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 to expand the definition of an "intimate visual recording" to explicitly include images created, synthesised, or alt…
Read full bill text
Deepfake Digital Harm and Exploitation Bill
EXPLANATORY NOTE
GENERAL POLICY STATEMENT
Worldwide there has been a rise in the proliferation of sexually explicit deepfakes. This is where images or videos are digitally altered or synthesised to take an individual's recognisable likeness and turn it into sexually explicit material.
This form of material constitutes a clear violation of self-ownership and personal autonomy. Just as the unauthorised sharing of genuine intimate imagery is a rights infringement, so too is the false representation of a person in intimate contexts without consent. This conduct misappropriates a person's image for exploitative purposes, causing reputational, psychological, and often material harm. Criminalising such acts and enabling victims to seek redress and removal aligns with a commitment to defending individuals from coercion, fraud, and aggression.
This Bill holds accountable those who use digital tools to violate other individuals' agency. It does this by amending both the Crimes Act 1961 and the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 to expand the definition of an "intimate visual recording" to explicitly include images created, synthesised, or altered to show a person's likeness produced without consent.
This Bill is an omnibus Bill introduced under Standing Order 267(a).
CLAUSE BY CLAUSE ANALYSIS
Clause 1 is the Title clause.
Clause 2 is the commencement clause and provides for the Bill to come into force on the day after Royal assent.
Part 1 amends the Crimes Act 1961 to extend the definition of intimate visual recording to include images that are created, synthesised, or altered to appear to be intimate visual images. This extension will mean that the provisions relating to intimate visual images (sections 216H to 216N) will apply to created images.
Part 2 amends the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 to extend the definition of intimate visual recording in that Act to include images that are created, synthesised, or altered to appear to be intimate visual images. This extension will mean that the offence in section 22A of the Act will apply to created images.
The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows:
1 Title
This Act is the Deepfake Digital Harm and Exploitation Act 2025 .
2 Commencement
This Act comes into force on the day after Royal assent.
3 Principal Act
This Part amends the Crimes Act 1961.
4 Section 216G amended (Intimate visual recording defined)
After section 216G(1), insert: 1A In sections 216H to 216N, intimate visual recording includes a visual recording that has been created, synthesised, or altered without the knowledge or consent of the person who is the subject of the recording, and appears to show the person— a naked or with their genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breasts exposed, partially exposed, or clad solely in undergarments; or b engaged in an intimate sexual activity; or c engaged in showering, toileting, or other personal bodily activity that involves dressing or undressing.
After section 216G(2), insert: 4 In this section and section 216N, subject , in relation to an intimate visual recording, means an individual who is, or appears to be, featured or depicted in the recording.
5 Principal Act
This Part amends the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015.
6 Section 4 amended (Interpretation)
In section 4, definition of intimate visual recording , after paragraph (a) insert: ab includes a visual recording that has been created, synthesised, or altered without the knowledge or consent of the person who is the subject of the recording, and appears to show the person— i naked or with their genitals, pubic area, buttocks, or female breasts exposed, partially exposed, or clad solely in undergarments; or ii engaged in an intimate sexual activity; or iii engaged in showering, toileting, or other personal bodily activity that involves dressing or undressing.
In section 4, insert in its appropriate alphabetical order: subject , in relation to an intimate visual recording, means an individual who is, or appears to be, featured or depicted in the recording
Hansard
May 20, 2026
Deepfake Digital Harm and Exploitation Bill — Referral to Select Committee
· Full day report
Referral to Select Committee DEPUTY SPEAKER (16:40): The question is, That the Deepfake Digital Harm and Exploitation Bill be considered by the Social Services and Community Committee. Motion agreed to. Bill referred to the Social Services and Community Committee. DEPUTY SPEAKER: Congratulations, Laura McClure.
Read full Hansard debate
Referral to Select Committee
DEPUTY SPEAKER (16:40): The question is, That the Deepfake Digital Harm and Exploitation Bill be considered by the Social Services and Community Committee.
Motion agreed to.
Bill referred to the Social Services and Community Committee.
DEPUTY SPEAKER: Congratulations, Laura McClure.