Parliament bill

Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill

Committee of whole house · Introduced by Hon Mark Mitchell · National Party

Last checked
September 20, 2026 00:01
Source captured
September 20, 2026 00:01
Source
View on Parliament.nz

What this bill does

The bill passed its first reading 117–6; the vote was not unanimous. According to the explanatory material, Corrections lacks a specific legal framework for managing a small group of prisoners who pose an extreme risk to prison or public safety, while prolonged solitary confinement remains a concern. The bill aims to create lawful processes for managing these prisoners while protecting safety, natural justice, and minimum human contact. The bill lets the Corrections chief executive designate eligible high-risk prisoners for restrictive management after an advisory-panel process, with notice and review rights, and requires all prisoners to be offered minimum meaningful human contact.

AI-assisted summary based on the bill text and linked Hansard debates.

Latest voting result

April 28, 2026
First reading: Passed Party vote

Ayes 117 · Noes 6

  • National Party Aye · 49 votes
  • Labour Party Aye · 34 votes
  • Green Party Aye · 15 votes
  • ACT Party Aye · 11 votes
  • NZ First Party Aye · 8 votes
  • Te Pāti Māori No · 5 votes
  • Ferris, Tākuta No

View the vote in Hansard

Arguments raised in Parliament

AI-assisted summary of the linked Hansard debates. Each point is grounded in the cited transcript.

Arguments for

Corrections will operate under statutory rules rather than broad administrative discretion when managing designated high-risk prisoners, making severe restrictions more clearly lawful and bounded.

Prisoners subjected to restrictive regimes will receive minimum meaningful human contact, which is intended to reduce isolation’s psychological harm and preserve the basis for rehabilitation.

Corrections’ increased oversight of prisoner trust-account transactions will reduce prisoner-to-prisoner intimidation, coercion, and associated illicit activity.

Corrections can seek a High Court order to destroy a deceased designated terrorist’s property, preventing property that could harm people from circulating in the community.

Arguments against

Nuance and qualifications

The chief executive’s designation power is mitigated by review requirements when relevant new information or changed circumstances make a designation inappropriate or unnecessary.

Bill text

Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill

Version published August 31, 2026 00:00.

Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows: 1 Title This Act is the Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Act 2026 . 2 Commencement This Act comes into force on the day after Royal assent. Subsection (1) is subject to subsection s (2A) and (3) . Section 18A(2) (which inserts section 70(3A) to (8) of the Corrections Act 2004, relating to physical exercise) comes into force 6 months after Royal assent. Sections 17 to (1) and (2), 18, and 19 (1) (which make amendments to the Corrections Act 2004 relating to minimum meaningful human contact and to outgoing telephone calls) come into force 12 months after Royal assent. 3 Principal Act This Part amends the Corrections Act 2004. 4 Section 3 amended (Interpretation) In section 3(1), insert in their appropriate alphabetical order: designated-management prisoner means a person who is subject to an in-force interim or final designation made under section 52A designated-management prisoner cell means a cell that has been designated as a designated-management prisoner cell under section 52M organised criminal group is defined i…
Read full bill text
Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill The Parliament of New Zealand enacts as follows: 1 Title This Act is the Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Act 2026 . 2 Commencement This Act comes into force on the day after Royal assent. Subsection (1) is subject to subsection s (2A) and (3) . Section 18A(2) (which inserts section 70(3A) to (8) of the Corrections Act 2004, relating to physical exercise) comes into force 6 months after Royal assent. Sections 17 to (1) and (2), 18, and 19 (1) (which make amendments to the Corrections Act 2004 relating to minimum meaningful human contact and to outgoing telephone calls) come into force 12 months after Royal assent. 3 Principal Act This Part amends the Corrections Act 2004. 4 Section 3 amended (Interpretation) In section 3(1), insert in their appropriate alphabetical order: designated-management prisoner means a person who is subject to an in-force interim or final designation made under section 52A designated-management prisoner cell means a cell that has been designated as a designated-management prisoner cell under section 52M organised criminal group is defined in section 3AA for the purposes of section s 52D(1)(c) and 58(1)(e) Panel means the Designated-Management Prisoner Advisory Panel established by Schedule 1AB 5 New section 3AA inserted (Meaning of organised criminal group) After section 3, insert: 3AA Meaning of organised criminal group 1 In section s 52D(1)(c) and 58(1)(e) , organised criminal group means a group of 3 or more people who have as their objective, or one of their objectives,— a obtaining a material benefit from the commission of 1 or more offences that are punishable by imprisonment for a term of 4 years or more; or b obtaining a material benefit from conduct outside New Zealand that, if it occurred in New Zealand, would constitute the commission of 1 or more offences that are punishable by imprisonment for a term of 4 years or more; or c the commission of 1 or more serious violent offences; or d conduct outside New Zealand that, if it occurred in New Zealand, would constitute the commission of 1 or more serious violent offences. 2 In subsection (1) , obtaining a material benefit from the commission of any offence or from any conduct means obtaining, directly or indirectly, any privilege, pecuniary advantage, property, or other valuable consideration of any kind for— a engaging in that offence or conduct; or b doing any thing that forms part of engaging in that offence or conduct. 3 In subsection (1) , serious violent offence means any offence— a that is punishable by a period of imprisonment for a term of 7 years or more; and b where the conduct constituting the offence involves— i loss of a person’s life or serious risk of loss of a person’s life; or ii serious injury to a person or serious risk of serious injury to a person; or iii serious damage to property in circumstances endangering the physical safety of any person; or iv perverting the course of justice, where the purpose of the conduct is to prevent, seriously hinder, or seriously obstruct the detection, investigation, or prosecution of any offence— A that is punishable by a period of imprisonment for a term of 7 years or more; and B that involved, involves, or would involve conduct of the kind referred to in any of subparagraphs (i) to (iii) . 4 For the purposes of subsection (1) , a group of persons is capable of being an organised criminal group whether or not— a some of the persons in the group are subordinates or employees of others in the group; or b only some of the people involved in the group at a particular time are involved in the planning, arrangement, or execution at that time of any particular action, activity, or transaction; or c the membership of the group changes from time to time. 1961 No 43 ss 2(1) (definitions of obtain a material benefit and serious violent offence), 98A; 2009 No 8 s 5A 6 Section 10 amended (Delegation of powers and functions of chief executive) In section 10, replace Despite anything in clauses 2 to 4 of Schedule 6 of the Public Service Act 2020 or in any other provision of this Act or of any other enactment, the chief executive must not delegate to any staff member of a prison— with The chief executive must not, under any power of delegation, delegate to any staff member of a prison— . After section 10(e), insert: eaa any power, function, or duty to make, amend, revoke, revoke and replace, or ensure review of, rules (about the operation of a trust account) made under section 46A ; or eab any power, function, or duty conferred or imposed on the chief executive under any of sections 52A to 52M and Schedule 1AB (which relate to designated-management prisoners); or In section 10, insert as subsection s (2) to (4) : 2 The chief executive must not, under any power of delegation, delegate to any person any power, function, or duty conferred or imposed on the chief executive under any of sections 52A to 52M and Schedule 1AB (which relate to designated-management prisoners). 3 However, the chief executive may, under any power of delegation, delegate any power, function, or duty to which subsection (2) applies if— a the chief executive has an actual or potential conflict of interest if they exercise or perform the power, function, or duty; and b the delegation is reasonably required to ensure that the power, function, or duty is exercised or performed unaffected by that actual or potential conflict of interest. 2 4 This section applies despite anything in— a clauses 2 to 4 of Schedule 6 of the Public Service Act 2020; or b any other provision of this Act or of any other legislation. 7 Section 45 replaced (Disposal and destruction of prisoner property) Replace section 45 with: 45 Destruction or disposal of prisoner property: general Prison manager considers item to be one specified for destruction or disposal 1 An item of prisoner property may be destroyed or disposed of in a manner approved by the prison manager if the prison manager considers the item to be— a a dangerous item or substance; or b a health hazard; or c inflammable; or d alcohol; or e a controlled drug (within the meaning of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975); or f objectionable; or g perishable. Failure to comply with requirement that item be removed from prison 2 An item of prisoner property may be destroyed or disposed of in a manner approved by the prison manager if— a the prison manager requires the item to be removed from the prison in accordance with any regulations made under this Act; and b the prisoner concerned fails to comply with that requirement reasonably promptly. Written notice of decision to destroy item 3 Before any destruction of a prisoner’s property is carried out under this section, the prison manager must give the prisoner concerned— a written notice of the prison manager’s decision under subsection (1) or (2) to destroy the relevant item of prisoner property: b a specified period to respond to, complain about, or otherwise challenge that decision. 4 A period specified under subsection (3)(b) must be— a as long as is reasonably practicable in the circumstances; but b no longer than 14 days after the notice is given. Regulations about asking for written acknowledgment of property register entry 5 Subsection (3) does not affect regulations under sections 200(1)(c) and 202(d) requiring that the prisoner be asked for written acknowledgement of any entry in, or amendment to any existing entry in, the property register, and that describes fully all items of property destroyed under this section. 8 New section 45AA inserted (Destruction or forfeiture of prisoner property: harmful item of property of prisoner who, before or on their death, was terrorist entity) After section 45A, insert: 45AA Destruction or forfeiture of prisoner property: harmful item of property of prisoner who, before or on their death, was terrorist entity Item of property to which this section applies 1 This section applies to an item of property of a person (the  person ) if— a the person died while the person was— i a prisoner who is in the legal custody under this Act of the chief executive ( see section 38); or ii temporarily released from custody under section 62; or iii liable to be detained in the legal custody of another person, or remanded to a hospital, under other legislation (for example, as a special patient as defined in section 2(1) of the Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992); and b the person, at any time before or on their death, was a terrorist entity; and c the item of property is, on the person’s death, held by or on behalf of the department. Application to High Court for order authorising destruction of item 2 The chief executive may, if satisfied that the item of property is, or is likely to be, a harmful item of property, apply to the High Court for an order authorising— a destruction of the item of property (if it is not trust account money); or b forfeiture to the Crown of the item of property (if it is trust account money). 3 The application must be made by originating application in the manner provided by the High Court Rules 2016 and must be made on notice to— a the representative of the person; and b any other person, or other people, that the court may direct. Court’s power to make order authorising destruction or forfeiture to Crown 4 On an application under this section, the court may, if satisfied that the item is, or is likely to be, a harmful item of property, make an order authorising— a destruction of the item of property (if it is not trust account money); or b forfeiture to the Crown of the item of property (if it is trust account money). Definitions 5 In this section,— harmful item of property means an item of property that, if returned, would, or is likely to, result in dealing with the item that is or includes all or any of the following harmful outcomes: a an offence against section 9 of the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002 (prohibition on dealing with property of, or derived or generated from property of, designated terrorist entity): b promoting or encouraging hostility towards any group of persons on 1 or more of the grounds specified in section 21 of the Human Rights Act 1993: c promoting, encouraging, or facilitating criminal acts or terrorism: d further harm to (for example, further trauma to or further stress for) victims of criminal acts or terrorism committed by the person: e prejudice to the security or defence of New Zealand, or to the international relations of the Government of New Zealand, arising from all or any of the outcomes specified in paragraphs (a) to (d) item of property , of a person who is or was a prisoner, includes, without limitation, all trust account money (if any) of that person representative , of a person, means— a the executor or administrator of the person’s estate (if known to, or reasonably able to be ascertained by, the department); or b a person nominated by the person as a contact person (if the executor or administrator of the person’s estate is not known to, or reasonably able to be ascertained by, the department); or c in any other case, the person’s next of kin (if known to, or reasonably able to be ascertained by, the department) returned , in relation to an item of property of a person, means that the item is made available, in any way, by the department, to either or both of the following (whether they are in or outside New Zealand): a a representative: b any 1 or more members of the public (whether they obtain the item of property apart from, or directly or indirectly through, a representative) terrorism means a terrorist act as defined in section 5(1) of the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002 terrorist entity means— a a designated terrorist entity as defined in section 4(1) of the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002; or b a member of a group or organisation that is a designated terrorist entity (as so defined) trust account money , in relation to a person who is or was a prisoner, means all money (if any) held exclusively for that person in a trust account and to be paid,— a under section 46(3), to the prisoner when the prisoner is discharged from a prison; or b under section 46(4)(b), to the executor or administrator of the prisoner’s estate if the prisoner dies while in legal custody. 9 Section 46 amended (Trust account and purchasing system for prisoners) In section 46(1), delete belonging to prisoners . Replace section 46(2) with: 2 A trust account must be operated and maintained— a in the prescribed manner; and b in accordance with all applicable requirements imposed by rules made under section 46A . After section 46(4), insert: 4A However, subsection (4)(b) applies to money held exclusively for a prisoner who is a person to whom section 45AA applies only if— a the chief executive has decided not to apply for an order for forfeiture to the Crown of the money under section 45AA ; or b an application made for an order for forfeiture to the Crown of the money under section 45AA has been finally determined (including any rehearing, retrial, or appeal) and declined. 10 New section 46A inserted (Rules about operation of trust account) After section 46, insert: 46A Rules about operation of trust account 1 The chief executive must, in respect of all corrections prisons, make rules imposing requirements for the following: a the operation of 1 or more trust accounts in which money is held exclusively for a particular prisoner: b any money that is held exclusively for a particular prisoner within 1 or more trust accounts. 2 Examples of requirements that may be imposed by rules made under this section include requirements relating to all or any of the following: a how money may be deposited into, or withdrawn from, a trust account in which money is held exclusively for that prisoner: b who may deposit money into the trust account: c the maximum amount of money that may be held in the trust account exclusively for that prisoner: d maximum amounts of money that may be deposited into the trust account in a single transaction or over a specified period, or both, to be held exclusively for the particular prisoner in the trust account: e other requirements for deposits of money into the trust account: f maximum amounts of money held exclusively for the particular prisoner in the trust account that may be withdrawn from the trust account in a single transaction or over a specified period, or both: g other requirements for withdrawals of money from the trust account. 3 A requirement imposed by the rules applies to the operation of a trust account and to any money that is held exclusively for a particular prisoner within the trust account, unless— a the application of the requirement to the trust account or money is inconsistent with a provision of this Act, of any regulations made under this Act, or of any other legislation; or b the rules provide that the requirement does not apply to the trust account or money if the prison manager is satisfied that there are special circumstances that— i relate to meeting the prisoner’s rehabilitative, reintegrative, humanitarian, or health needs; and ii justify the requirement not applying to the trust account or money. 4 The chief executive must ensure that a review of the rules is completed— a in the 5 years after the commencement of this section; and b in the 5 years after each review completed under this section. 5 Rules under this section are secondary legislation ( see Part 3 of the Legislation Act 2019 for publication requirements) 11 Section 47 amended (Security classifications) After section 47(1), insert: 2 Despite subsection (1), the chief executive must also ensure that no security classification is assigned to a prisoner who is— a a prisoner who is subject to a sentence of imprisonment for a term exceeding 3 months; and b a designated-management prisoner. 2A Despite subsection (2) , the chief executive must also ensure that a security classification is assigned to a prisoner who— a is a prisoner who is subject to a sentence of imprisonment for a term exceeding 3 months; and b was, but has ceased to be, a designated-management prisoner. After section 47(3), insert: 3A Subsection (3)(b) does not apply while the prisoner is a designated-management prisoner (as defined in section 3(1)). Before section 47(4)(a), insert: aaa the prisoner’s interim or final designation as a designated-management prisoner expires or is revoked; or 12 New sections 52A to 52M and cross-heading inserted After section 52, insert: Designated-management prisoners 52A Interim or final designation Power to make, renew, or replace designation 1 The chief executive may make an interim designation or a final designation designating as a designated-management prisoner a person who— a is an eligible person (as defined in section 52B ); and b meets the test for designation ( see sections 52C to 52F ). Designation must also comply with related sections 2 This section is subject to sections 52G to 52J . 52B Meaning of eligible person Interim designation 1 In section 52A(1)(a) , eligible person , for an interim designation, means a person who the chief executive is satisfied on reasonable grounds is either or both of the following: a a person who is, or will in the next 7 days be, a person who is for the time being in the legal custody under this Act of the chief executive: b a person who is subject to an extradition request made by, or to, New Zealand. Final designation 2 In section 52A(1)(a) , eligible person , for a final designation, means a person who is for the time being in the legal custody under this Act of the chief executive. 52C Test for designation A person meets the test for designation under section 52A(1)(b) only if the chief executive is satisfied on reasonable grounds that— a the person, while in the legal custody under this Act of the chief executive (including, without limitation, during any temporary removal from prison) or during any temporary release from that legal custody, poses an extreme risk to prison or public safety , safety of prisoners, safety of staff members or employees or visitors, or prison safety or security ( see sections 52D and 52E ); and b restrictive management is necessary to manage effectively that extreme risk ( see sections 52F and 52L ). 52D Person taken to pose extreme risk to prison or public safety , safety of prisoners, safety of staff members or employees or visitors, or prison safety or security 1 For the purposes of section 52C(a) , a person, while in the legal custody under this Act of the chief executive (including, without limitation, during any temporary removal from prison) or during any temporary release from that legal custody, poses an extreme risk to prison or public safety , safety of prisoners, safety of staff members or employees or visitors, or prison safety or security if the person, while in that custody or during that temporary release, poses an extreme risk of all or any of the following conduct: a committing any serious offence under a law of New Zealand or of, or of any State, territory, province, or other part of, another country (for example, any serious offence that is a serious sexual or violent offence , serious drug offence, serious money laundering offence, serious illicit goods trading or trafficking offence, serious human trafficking offence, or serious offence against the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002 ): b disrupting severely a prison’s safety , or security , or good order : c committing any offence against the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002: c recruiting a prisoner or another person into an organised criminal group (as defined in section 3AA ): d radicalising, or recruiting to an ideology, another person, if the radicalisation or ideology is likely to result in harm to that radicalised or recruited other person, 1 or more other persons, or both. 2 Subsection (1)(a) to (d) applies whether any specified conduct— a would be brought about by the prisoner directly or indirectly (for example, indirectly by aiding, abetting, inciting, counselling, procuring, promoting, encouraging, or facilitating another person (even if not a person under control or supervision) to bring it about): b would involve endangering or prejudicing the security or safety of, committing an offence against, recruiting, or radicalising or recruiting, another person who is, or is not, a person under control or supervision: c would occur, in whole or in part, in or outside the prison. 2A In subsection (1)(d) , harm to a person who is radicalised or recruited to an ideology includes, without limitation, harm caused to that person through their participation in, or involvement with, terrorism, violent extremism, or both. 3 This section does not limit the generality of section 52C(a) . 52E Risk taken to be extreme risk 1 For the purposes of section 52C(a) or 52D , a person is taken to pose an extreme risk of conduct if the person poses a risk that (if not managed restrictively as provided in section 52C(b) ) involves a high degree of likelihood of includes a real risk of — a that conduct happening; or b that conduct, if it happens, causing a severe degree of harm; or c both of the things specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) . 2 This section does not limit the generality of sections 52C(a) and 52D . 52F Restrictive management to manage effectively extreme risk 1 This section applies when the chief executive is considering, for the purposes of section 52C(b) , whether restrictive management is necessary to manage effectively the extreme risk mentioned in section 52C(a) . 2 The chief executive must consider— a the types of management under this Act (other than sections 52A to 52M ) necessary to manage effectively that risk; and b the levels of restrictiveness of the types of management under this Act (other than sections 52A to 52M ) necessary to manage effectively that risk; and c the effect of an in-force designation under section 52L . 52G Further requirements for interim designation When requirements in this section apply 1 Before making or renewing an interim designation under section 52A , the chief executive must comply with the requirements in this section. Request that Panel make recommendation on final designation 2 The chief executive must ensure that the Panel has been, or will soon be, requested by the chief executive to make a recommendation under clause 2 of Schedule 1AB . Person should be subject to effects of interim designation 3 The chief executive must be satisfied that the person should be subject to the effects of an in-force interim designation ( see section 52L ) until whichever occurs first of the following: a a final designation is made or replaced and comes into force in respect of the person ( see section 52J(2)(c)(i) ); or b the chief executive decides not to make or replace a final designation in respect of the person ( see section 52J(2)(c)(ii) ). 52H Further requirements for final designation When this section applies 1 This section applies when if the chief executive is deciding to make or replace, or to not make or replace, a final designation under section 52A . Panel’s recommendation and information Panel considered in making it 2 The chief executive must request, and take into account,— a the recommendation of the Panel; and b the information that the Panel considered in making that recommendation. Other relevant advice or information 3 The chief executive may take into account any other advice or information (for example, about the expected placement and management of the person) that the chief executive considers relevant to that decision. Duty to record reasons for departing from Panel’s recommendation 4 The chief executive must record their reasons for departing, to any extent, from the Panel’s recommendation. 52I Notice to person affected The chief executive must, as soon as is reasonably practicable, give a person— a written notice that the Panel has been, or will soon be, requested to recommend that the chief executive make or not make a final designation designating the person as a designated-management prisoner; and b a written summary of the reasons why a recommendation of the Panel has been, or will soon be, requested in respect of the person; and c information to the effect that, in making the Panel’s recommendation, the Panel must consider any written information or written submissions provided by, or on behalf of, the person ( see clause 6(a) of Schedule 1AB ); and d a written copy of any interim designation or final designation made designating the person as a designated-management prisoner; and e a written summary of the reasons why any interim designation or final designation was made designating the person as a designated-management prisoner; and f written notice that the chief executive is to review under section 52K(2) or (3) an in-force final designation designating the person as a designated-management prisoner; and g information to the effect that, in making the Panel’s recommendation on a review under section 52K(2) or (3) , the Panel must consider any written information or written submissions provided by, or on behalf of, the person ( see clause 6(a) of Schedule 1AB ); and h written notice of, and of the reasons for, the outcome of a review under section 52K(2) or (3) . Information to be given as soon as is reasonably practicable 1 The chief executive must, as soon as is reasonably practicable, give a person— Interim designation a a written copy of any interim designation made designating the person as a designated-management prisoner, together with a written summary of the reasons why that interim designation was made; and Panel recommendation relating to final designation b the following information relating to the Panel and a final designation: i written notice that the Panel has been, or will soon be, requested to recommend that the chief executive make or not make a final designation designating the person as a designated-management prisoner; and ii a written summary of the reasons why a recommendation of the Panel has been, or will soon be, requested in respect of the person; and iii information to the effect that, in making the Panel’s recommendation, the Panel must consider any written information or written submissions provided by, or on behalf of, the person before a reasonable deadline specified for the purpose ( see clause 6(a) of Schedule 1AB ); and Final designation made and related information c a written copy of any final designation made designating the person as a designated-management prisoner, together with— i a copy of the Panel’s recommendation in respect of the person, including, without limitation, a summary of the details required by clause 5(3A)(b) and (c) of Schedule 1AB ; and ii a written summary of the reasons why that final designation was made; and Review of in-force final designation d the following information relating to a review under section 52K(2) or (3) of an in-force final designation: i written notice that the chief executive is to review under section 52K(2) or (3) an in-force final designation designating the person as a designated-management prisoner; and ii information to the effect that, in making the Panel’s recommendation on a review under section 52K(2) or (3) , the Panel must consider any written information or written submissions provided by, or on behalf of, the person before a reasonable deadline specified for the purpose ( see clause 6(a) of Schedule 1AB ); and e written notice of, and of the reasons for, the outcome of a review under section 52K(2) or (3) . Exception if real risk to public safety, health or safety, or prison safety, security, or good order 2 However, subsection (3) applies if the chief executive believes on reasonable grounds that giving any information mentioned in subsection (1) as soon as is reasonably practicable would create a real risk of affecting adversely all or any of the following: a public safety: b the health or safety of either or both of the following: i the prisoner: ii any other person at a prison (for example, any staff member, employee, or visitor): c a prison’s safety, security, or good order. 3 The chief executive must (despite subsection (1) ) give the information to which subsection (2) applies as soon as is consistent with managing effectively the risk mentioned in subsection (2) . 52IA Records of reasons for interim or final designation 1 The chief executive must maintain records of the reasons why any interim designation or final designation was made designating the person as a designated-management prisoner. 2 This section does not affect or limit the Public Records Act 2005. 52IB Communication assistance for person affected 1 This section applies if the chief executive or a staff member of a prison knows that a person— a may be, is, or has been, subject to an interim designation or a final designation designating the person as a designated-management prisoner; and b has difficulties with verbal or written communication (for example, in communicating orally, or in reading and writing). 2 The chief executive or staff member must ensure that the person is provided with adequate communication assistance to help enable the person to— a understand information provided to the person under section 52I ; and b understand, and communicate effectively in, any hearings of an oral statement under clause 5(3) of Schedule 1AB ; and c compose, approve, and provide written information or written submissions under clause 6(a) of Schedule 1AB ; and d compose a written request for a review under section 52K(3) . 52J Duration and renewal or replacement When interim or final designation comes into force 1 An interim designation or a final designation comes into force— a on a day that— i is, or is after, the day after the designation is made; and ii is stated in the designation as the day on which it comes into force; or b if the person concerned is not in the legal custody under this Act of the chief executive on the day stated under paragraph (a) , on the day on which the person later becomes a person in that legal custody. When interim designation ends and may be renewed 2 An interim designation made in respect of a person— a expires 28 days after it comes into force (unless it comes into force after it is renewed), unless it is earlier revoked or the person earlier ceases to be in the legal custody of the chief executive, for example, because the person — i earlier ceases to be remanded in custody; or ii is earlier released on parole; or iii earlier ceases to be serving a sentence of imprisonment; and b may be renewed, once only, in respect of the same person, for a further 14 days, to continue their interim designation after it would otherwise end and until a decision is made about whether to make, or to replace, a final designation in respect of the person, unless the renewed designation is earlier revoked or the person earlier ceases to be in the legal custody of the chief executive, for example, because the person — i earlier ceases to be remanded in custody; or ii is earlier released on parole; or iii earlier ceases to be serving a sentence of imprisonment; and c ceases to have effect under this paragraph if— i a final designation is made and comes into force in respect of the person to whom the interim designation applies; or ii the chief executive decides not to make a final designation in respect of that person. When final designation ends and may be replaced 3 A final designation made in respect of a person— a expires after the period (not exceeding 2 years after it comes into force) stated in it as the period after which it expires, unless it is earlier revoked or the person earlier ceases to be in the legal custody of the chief executive, for example, because the person — i earlier ceases to be remanded in custody; or ii is earlier released on parole; or iii earlier ceases to be serving a sentence of imprisonment; and b may be replaced by 1 or more later final designations made in respect of the same person (based on the same, or a different, risk). When final designation ends if chief executive does not meet applicable deadline 4 An in-force final designation made in respect of a person expires at the applicable deadline under section 52K(2A) or (3B) if the chief executive fails to comply with that deadline. When final designation ends if review not completed by applicable deadline 5 An in-force final designation made in respect of a person expires at the applicable deadline under section 52K(5) or (6) if the in-force final designation is the subject of a review under section 52K(2) or (3) that— a commences; and b is not completed by the applicable deadline under section 52K(5) or (6) . 52K Review of in-force final designation Designation to be copied to relevant prison manager 1AAA After an in-force final designation is made, or reviewed under this section, the chief executive must promptly copy to a relevant prison manager the following: a the designation (as made, or as reviewed under this section); and b information identifying all factors on which the designation is based. If chief executive is informed by department , and is satisfied , of developments 1 The department A relevant prison manager must inform the chief executive if, after an in-force final designation is made, or reviewed under this section, the department relevant prison manager becomes aware that either or both of the following developments has or have occurred: a new information relevant to the designation has become available and makes, or may make, the designation unnecessary or inappropriate: b a change in a factor on which the designation is based has occurred and makes, or may make, the designation unnecessary or inappropriate. 2 If informed by the department a relevant prison manager, and satisfied , that either or both of those developments has or have occurred, the chief executive must— a review the in-force final designation; and b in the light of the review, decide whether (and, if so, how) to amend, revoke, or revoke and replace that designation. 2A If informed on a day by a relevant prison manager of either or both of those developments, the chief executive must decide within the following 28 days whether they are satisfied that either or both of those developments has or have occurred. If chief executive is satisfied, on own initiative or on request, of developments 3 If satisfied, on their own initiative, or on a written request by the designated person -management prisoner to conduct a review under this subsection, that either or both of those developments has or have occurred, the chief executive must— a review the in-force final designation; and b in the light of the review, decide whether (and, if so, how) to amend, revoke, or revoke and replace that designation. 3AA Despite subsection (3) , a designated-management prisoner may not make a written request under subsection (3) if a written request for a review of the in-force final designation that applies to the prisoner was considered, as a consequence of an earlier written request under subsection (3) , within the previous 6 months. 3A A relevant prison manager who becomes aware of a written request by the designated-management prisoner to conduct a review under subsection (3) must ensure that the request is forwarded promptly to the chief executive. 3B If informed on a day by a relevant prison manager of a written request by the designated-management prisoner, the chief executive must decide within the following 28 days whether they are satisfied that either or both of those developments has or have occurred. Process for review 4 In a review under subsection (2) or (3) and in any related amendment, revocation, or revocation and replacement of an in-force final designation, the chief executive— a must request, and take into account, the recommendation of the Panel and the information considered by the Panel in making that recommendation; and b may take into account any other advice or information that the chief executive considers relevant to that decision. 5 A review under subsection (2) or (3) must be completed within 28 days after the day on which the chief executive has decided that they are satisfied that either or both of those developments has or have occurred, and so must, under that subsection, carry out the review. 6 However, the chief executive may, if in their opinion it is reasonably necessary to do so, extend the deadline under subsection (5) , once only, and for a further 14 days. 52L Effect of in-force designation (restrictive management and entitlements) Restrictive management to manage effectively extreme risk 1 A designated-management prisoner must be— a promptly placed by the prison manager in a designated-management prisoner cell, except to the extent that the prisoner is already, or becomes,— i a prisoner who is subject to an in-force direction under section 60(1)(b) (to assess or ensure mental health) and who under section 61 must instead be provided with accommodation that— A has items and features prescribed by regulations made under this Act; and B meets standards prescribed by regulations made under this Act; or ii an at-risk prisoner who under section 61B(a) must instead be placed in an at-risk cell or alternative accommodation that the prison manager considers adequate to protect the prisoner from self-harm; and b otherwise restrictively managed ( see sections 52C(b) and 52F ) under this Act (other than sections 52A to 52M ) in a way that is consistent with the prisoner’s— i designation as a designated-management prisoner; and ii case management plan required by section 51. 2 However, subsection (1) does not apply while a designated-management prisoner is— a detained in a Police jail under section 34; or b detained in any prison, hospital, Police station, or other place authorised under section 35(1) or (2). Examples of restrictive management (other than required placement) 3 Examples of the management (other than the required placement) under this Act (other than sections 52A to 52M ) mentioned in subsection (1) are greater possible use of the following: a restrictions on being issued with, or allowed to keep, authorised property: b restrictions on freedom of movement within the prison: c limits on the periods for which the cell or unit in which the designated-management prisoner is placed is, or may be, unlocked: d regulation and approval of visits by private visitors: e monitoring, collecting, using, and disclosing prisoner communications and information sources for an intelligence purpose. Entitlements 4 A designated-management prisoner— a must be provided with reasonable access to a cell-adjacent yard— i for a cell in which the prisoner is placed; and ii if, and only if, it is a mandatory item or feature of that cell under regulations made under section 52M(3)(a) ; and b must not have the prisoner’s opportunity to associate with other prisoners denied or restricted, except in accordance with this Act or regulations made under this Act (for example, under all or any of sections 58, 59, 60, and 61CA ) : ; and c is entitled under section 69(1)(i) to make outgoing telephone calls, as provided for in section 77(3A) . 5 Subsection (4) does not limit— a section 69 (minimum entitlements); or b section 69A (minimum meaningful human contact). 52M Designation of designated-management prisoner cell Prison manager designation of cell that meets requirements 1 The prison manager may designate a cell as a designated-management prisoner cell. 2 The designation— a must be in writing; and b may be revoked at any time. Required items, features, and standards 3 A designated-management prisoner cell must— a have items and features prescribed by regulations made under this Act; and b meet standards prescribed by regulations made under this Act. Chief executive designation of cell that does not meet requirements 4 However, the chief executive may, despite subsections (1) to (3) , designate a cell as a designated-management prisoner cell— a even though the cell does not comply with subsection (3) ; and b if satisfied that it is not reasonably practicable for the cell to comply with subsection (3) . 5 The designation— a must be in writing; and b must specify the period to which the designation applies; and c must specify any conditions on which the designation is made; and d may be revoked at any time. 13 Section 54 amended (Reasons for transfer) After section 54(1)(f), insert: fa to implement section 52L as required by the prisoner’s designation as a designated-management prisoner, or otherwise to give effect to, or to enable management of the prisoner consistent with, that designation: 14 Sections 57 to 61 and cross-heading above section 57 replaced Replace sections 57 to 61 and the cross-heading above section 57 with: Denial or restriction of opportunity to associate with other prisoners 57 Limits on denial or restriction Limits on denial or restriction only in accordance with Act or regulations 1 The opportunity of a prisoner to associate with other prisoners must not be denied or restricted, except in accordance with this Act or regulations made under this Act. Directions must not be more restrictive than reasonably necessary 2 A direction given under section 58(1), 59(1)(a) or (b), 60, or 61CA must not be more restrictive than is reasonably necessary to ensure the maintenance of the law and the safety of the public, corrections staff, and persons under control or supervision. 58 Segregation for security, good order, safety, or preventing offending, radicalising, or recruiting to ideology or organised criminal group Direction 1 The prison manager may direct that the opportunity of a prisoner to associate with other prisoners be restricted or denied if, in the manager’s opinion, any of the following apply: a the security, or good order, of the prison would otherwise be endangered or prejudiced: b the safety of another prisoner, or of another person, or of both, would otherwise be endangered: c offences (other than offences against discipline) would otherwise be committed: d a prisoner or another person would otherwise be radicalised, or recruited to an ideology, and that would likely result in harm to that radicalised or recruited other person, 1 or more other persons, or both: e a prisoner or another person would otherwise be recruited into an organised criminal group (as defined in section 3AA ). 1A Subsection (1)(a) to (e) applies whether any outcome specified— a would be brought about by the prisoner directly or indirectly (by aiding, abetting, inciting, counselling, procuring, promoting, encouraging, or facilitating another person (even if not a person under control or supervision) to bring it about): b would involve endangering or prejudicing the security or safety of, committing an offence against, or radicalising or recruiting, another person who is, or is not, a person under control or supervision: c would occur, in whole or in part, in or outside the prison. 1AA In subsection (1)(d) , harm to a person who is radicalised or recruited to an ideology includes, without limitation, harm caused to that person through their participation in, or involvement with, terrorism, violent extremism, or both. 1B A direction given under subsection (1) must, under section 57(2) , not be more restrictive than is reasonably necessary to ensure the maintenance of the law and the safety of the public, corrections staff, and persons under control or supervision. 2 If a direction is given under subsection (1) ,— a the prisoner concerned must promptly be given the reasons in writing for the direction and any subsequent direction under subsection (3)(c) : b the chief executive must promptly be informed of the direction and the reasons for it. Variation of direction from restricting to denying association, or vice versa 2A The prison manager may, at any time while a direction under subsection (1) is in force (and without revoking and replacing it), vary the direction in line with subsection (1) and— a from one that restricts association to one that denies association; or b from one that denies association to one that restricts association. 2B A variation under subsection (2A) is part of, and must be read with, the direction concerned. 2C If a variation is made under subsection (2A) ,— a the prisoner concerned must promptly be given the reasons in writing for the variation; and b the chief executive must promptly be informed of the variation and the reasons for it; and c the variation must, if it affects a direction that continues in force because of a direction under subsection (3)(d)(ii) or (e) , also be notified, with the reasons for the variation, in writing to a Visiting Justice at the time of the next review of that direction under subsection (3)(e) . Revocation, expiry, and review and continuation, of direction 3 A direction under subsection (1) — a must be revoked by the prison manager if there ceases to be any justification, under subsection (1) , for continuing to restrict or deny the opportunity of the prisoner to associate with other prisoners: b may be revoked at any time by the chief executive or a Visiting Justice: c expires after 14 days unless, before it expires, the chief executive directs that it continue in force: d if it continues in force because of a direction under paragraph (c) , must— i be reviewed by the chief executive at intervals of not more than 1 month: ii expire after 3 months unless a Visiting Justice directs that it continue in force: e if it continues in force because of a direction under paragraph (d)(ii) , must be reviewed by a Visiting Justice at intervals of not more than 3 months. Review periods 4 Review periods in subsection (3)(c), (d)(i) and (ii), and (e) are subject to section 59A (review under section 58 or 59 if replacement directions). 59 Segregation for protective custody Direction 1 The prison manager may direct that the opportunity of a prisoner to associate with other prisoners be restricted or denied if— a the prisoner requests that the prisoner’s opportunity to associate be restricted or denied and the manager considers, having regard to any information supplied by the prisoner or otherwise available to the manager, that it is in the best interests of the prisoner to give that direction; or b the prison manager is satisfied that— i the safety of the prisoner has been put at risk by another person; and ii there is no reasonable way to ensure the safety of the prisoner otherwise than by giving that direction. Direction must not be more restrictive than reasonably necessary 1A A direction given under subsection (1)(a) or (b) must, under section 57(2) , not be more restrictive than is reasonably necessary to ensure the maintenance of the law and the safety of the public, corrections staff, and persons under control or supervision. Direction under subsection (1)(a) ineffective unless, before or after giving of direction, prisoner concerned gives consent in writing to giving of direction 2 If a direction is given under subsection (1)(a) ,— a the direction is ineffective unless, either before or after the giving of the direction, the prisoner concerned gives that prisoner’s consent in writing to the giving of the direction: b the direction ceases to have effect if the prisoner concerned withdraws that prisoner’s consent to the giving of the direction, but the prison manager may give a further direction under subsection (1)(b) without that prisoner’s consent if subsection (1)(b) applies: c the direction ceases to have effect if the prisoner concerned has not withdrawn that prisoner’s consent to the giving of the direction and it is revoked by the prison manager because the prison er manager is satisfied that it is no longer in the best interests of that prisoner. Prisoner concerned must promptly be given reasons in writing, etc, for direction under subsection (1)(b) 3 If a direction is given under subsection (1)(b) ,— a the prisoner concerned must promptly be given the reasons in writing for the direction, and any subsequent direction under subsection (4)(c) : b the chief executive must promptly be informed of the direction and the reasons for it. Variation of direction from restricting to denying association, or vice versa 3A The prison manager may, at any time while a direction under subsection (1)(a) or (b) is in force (and without revoking and replacing it), vary the direction in line with subsection (1)(a) or (b) and— a from one that restricts association to one that denies association; or b from one that denies association to one that restricts association. 3B A variation under subsection (3A) is part of, and must be read with, the direction concerned. 3C If a variation is made under subsection (3A) to a direction given under subsection (1)(a) ,— a the variation is ineffective unless, either before or after the giving of the direction, the prisoner concerned gives that prisoner’s consent in writing to the making of the variation: b the direction ceases to have effect if the prisoner concerned withdraws that prisoner’s consent to the giving of the direction, but the prison manager may give a further direction under subsection (1)(b) without that prisoner’s consent if subsection (1)(b) applies. 3D If a variation is made under subsection (3A) to a direction given under subsection (1)(b) ,— a the prisoner concerned must promptly be given the reasons in writing for the variation; and b the chief executive must promptly be informed of the variation and the reasons for it. Revocation, expiry, and review and continuation, of direction given under subsection (1)(b) 4 If a direction is given under subsection (1)(b) , the direction— a must be revoked by the prison manager if there ceases to be any justification, under subsection (1)(b) , for continuing to restrict or deny the opportunity of the prisoner to associate with other prisoners: b may be revoked, at any time, by the chief executive: c expires after 14 days unless, before it expires, the chief executive directs that it continue in force: d must, if it continues in force because of a direction under paragraph (c) , be reviewed by the chief executive at intervals of not more than 3 months. Review periods 5 Review periods in subsection (4)(c) and (d) are subject to section 59A (review under section 58 or 59 if replacement directions). 59A Review under section 58 or 59 if replacement directions This section applies only if specified direction replaced in specified way 1 This section applies if the prison manager— a gives a direction under section 58(1) (the replaced direction )— i in respect of a prisoner; and ii that is revoked or expired; and b gives 1 or more other directions under section 58(1) (the replacement directions ) each of which— i is given in respect of the prisoner; and ii takes effect at, or at any time in the 5 days after, the time that the replaced direction, or an earlier replacement direction, is revoked or expires; and iii restricts or denies association (whether the replaced direction, or an earlier replacement direction, at that time also restricted or denied association). 2 This section also applies if the prison manager— a gives a direction under section 59(1)(b) (the replaced direction )— i in respect of a prisoner; and ii that is revoked or expires; and b gives 1 or more other directions under section 59(1)(b) (the replacement directions ) each of which— i is given in respect of the prisoner; and ii takes effect at, or at any time in the 5 days after, the time that the replaced direction, or an earlier replacement direction, is revoked or expires; and iii restricts or denies association (whether the replaced direction, or an earlier replacement direction, at that time also restricted or denied association). Reasons for latest replacement direction and notice of effect of this section 3 If this section applies, the prison manager must promptly give the prisoner concerned— a the reasons in writing for the latest replacement direction (as required by section 58(2)(a) or 59(3)(a) ) ) ; and b a notice in writing summarising the effect of this section. Purposes for which this section applies 4 This section applies only for the purposes of calculating each of the following review periods: a the 14-day period in section 58(3)(c) or 59(4)(c) : b the 1-month period in section 58(3)(d)(i) : c the 3-month period in section 58(3)(d)(ii) or (e) or 59(4)(d) . Directions (whether or not continuous) taken to be single relevant period 5 For those purposes only, the replaced direction and replacement directions must (even if there are any gaps between the periods they are in force) be taken to be in force for a single relevant period that— a starts when the replaced direction starts to take effect; and b is the sum of, and counted including any gaps between, the periods that the replaced direction and replacement directions are in force. Example Directions taken to be single relevant period The replaced direction is in force 1 to 10 March (inclusive). A replacement direction is in force 15 to 18 March (inclusive). A replacement direction is in force 20 March to 5 June (inclusive). The directions must, for the purposes for which this section applies, be taken to be in force for a single relevant period that— starts at the beginning of 1 March: is 92 days long (10 days + 4 days + 78 days), excluding the gaps: is 97 days long, including the gaps (11 to 14 and 19 March): ends at the close of 5 June: is at least the 3-month review period in section 58(3)(d)(ii) or (e) or 59(4)(d) . When review must start if review period ends during gap between directions 6 Subsection (7) applies if— a the replaced direction and replacement directions must under this section be taken to be in force for a single relevant period; and b a review period in subsection (4)(a), (b), or (c) ends during a gap between the periods that the replaced direction and replacement directions are in force. Example Review period ends during gap between directions The replaced direction is in force 1 to 10 March (inclusive). A replacement direction is in force 16 to 19 March (inclusive). The directions must, for the purposes for which this section applies, be taken to be in force for a single relevant period that— starts at the beginning of 1 March: is 14 days long (10 days + 4 days), excluding the gap: is 19 days long, including the gap (11 to 15 March): ends at the close of 19 March: is at least the 14-day review period in section 58(3)(c) or 59(4)(c) . That 14-day review period ends during the gap (11 to 15 March). 7 The review to which the review period relates must be started and completed as soon as is reasonably practicable after the latest replacement direction is made. 8 Subsection (7) overrides any contrary provision of this Act. 60 Segregation for medical oversight Direction (if health centre manager of prison recommends one is desirable) 1 A prison manager may direct that the opportunity of a prisoner to associate with other prisoners be restricted or denied if the health centre manager of the prison recommends that a direction of this kind is desirable for either or both of the following reasons: a in order to assess or ensure the prisoner’s physical health, except against the risk of self-harm: b in order to assess or ensure the prisoner’s mental health. 1A Before a health centre manager makes a recommendation under subsection (1) that relates to a matter outside their scope of practice, they must consult a registered health professional whose scope of practice includes that matter. Direction must not be more restrictive than reasonably necessary 1B A direction given under this section must, under section 57(2) , not be more restrictive than is reasonably necessary to ensure the maintenance of the law and the safety of the public, corrections staff, and persons under control or supervision. Prisoner concerned must promptly be given reasons in writing, etc 2 If a direction is given under this section,— a the prisoner concerned must promptly be given the reasons for the direction in writing: b the chief executive must promptly be informed of the direction and the reasons for it. Variation of direction from restricting to denying association, or vice versa 2A The prison manager may, at any time while a direction under this section is in force (and without revoking and replacing it), vary the direction in line with subsection (1) if the variation made is one that the health centre manager of the prison recommends is desirable for the reasons set out in subsection (1)(a) or (b) , and the variation made varies the direction— a from one that restricts association to one that denies association; or b from one that denies association to one that restricts association. 2B Before a health centre manager makes a recommendation under subsection (2A) that relates to a matter outside their scope of practice, they must consult a registered health professional whose scope of practice includes that matter. 2C A variation under subsection (2A) is part of, and must be read with, the direction concerned. 2D If a variation is made under subsection (2A) to a direction given under this section,— a the prisoner concerned must promptly be given the reasons in writing for the variation; and b the chief executive must promptly be informed of the variation and the reasons for it. Revocation of direction 3 A direction under this section continues in force while the prisoner continues to be detained in the prison unless the prison manager or the chief executive revokes it. 4 The prison manager may not revoke a direction under this section unless the health centre manager advises that there has ceased to be any justification, under subsection (1) , for continuing to restrict or deny the opportunity of the prisoner to associate with other prisoners. Visits by registered health professional 5 While a direction under this section is in force, the health centre manager must, unless they are satisfied that it is not necessary in the circumstances, ensure that a registered health professional visits the prisoner concerned at least once a day. 6 As part of the visit referred to in subsection (5) , the registered health professional must consider and advise the health centre manager of any matters relevant to a review of the continuing justification for a direction under this section. 61 Accommodation if in-force direction under section 58, 59, or 60 1 A prisoner who is subject to an in-force direction under section 58, 59, or 60 must be provided with accommodation that— a has items and features prescribed by regulations made under this Act; and b meets standards prescribed by regulations made under this Act. 1A This section applies to a designated-management prisoner only if the prisoner is subject to an in-force direction under section 60(1)(b) (to assess or ensure mental health) ( see also sections 52L(1)(a)(i) and 52M ). 2 Those items, features, and standards may— a differ from the items and features provided in, or the standards required to be met for, accommodation for prisoners who are not subject to a direction under section 58, 59, or 60 : b differ depending on whether the direction was issued under section 58, 59, or 60 : c differ depending on the particular reason for the issue of a direction under any of those sections. 15 Section 61B amended (Initial steps that prison manager and health centre manager must take in respect of at-risk prisoner) In section 61B, after an at-risk prisoner , insert (whether or not the at-risk prisoner is subject to an in-force segregation direction under any of sections 58 to 60 and 61CA , is a designated-management prisoner ( see section 52L(1)(a)(ii) ), or is both) . 16 Section 61CA replaced (Prison manager may direct that at-risk prisoner’s association with other prisoners be restricted or denied) Replace section 61CA with: 61CA Prison manager may direct that at-risk prisoner’s association with other prisoners be restricted or denied Direction (if health centre manager of prison recommends one is desirable) 1 A prison manager may direct that the opportunity of an at-risk prisoner to associate with other prisoners be restricted or denied if— a the health centre manager of the prison recommends that a direction of that kind is desirable to address the prisoner’s risk of self-harm; and b the prison manager has confirmed the prisoner’s at-risk assessment. 1A More than 1 direction may be given under this section while an at-risk management plan is in effect for the prisoner. 1B Before a health centre manager makes a recommendation under subsection (1) that relates to a matter outside their scope of practice, they must consult a registered health professional whose scope of practice includes that matter ( see also section 61G on the manager giving advice). Direction restrictions or denial must be necessary for safety of at-risk prisoner 2 The direction may restrict or deny the at-risk prisoner’s opportunity to associate with other prisoners only to the extent that the restrictions or denial of opportunity are necessary for the safety of the at-risk prisoner. Direction must not be more restrictive than reasonably necessary 2A A direction under this section must, under section 57(2) , be no more restrictive than is reasonably necessary to ensure the maintenance of the law and the safety of the public, corrections staff, and the at-risk prisoner. At-risk prisoner to be promptly informed in writing of reasons for direction, etc 3 If the prison manager gives a direction under this section, the prison manager must ensure that— a the at-risk prisoner is promptly informed in writing of the reasons for the direction, and any variation of the direction; and b the chief executive is promptly informed in writing of the direction, and any variation of the direction, and the reasons for it. Revocation or variation of direction: general 4 The prison manager or chief executive may, at any time, revoke or vary a direction under this section. 5 However, the prison manager may not— a revoke a restriction on, or the denial of, the opportunity of the at-risk prisoner to associate with other prisoners under this section unless the health centre manager advises that there has ceased to be any justification, under subsections (1) and (2) , for the restriction or denial of opportunity; or b vary a restriction unless the prison manager has taken into account the advice of the health centre manager. 7 If the direction is not earlier revoked under subsection (4) , a prison manager must revoke a direction under this section when an at-risk management plan for the prisoner ends under section 61F(2). Variation of direction from restricting to denying association, or vice versa 7A The prison manager may, at any time while a direction under this section is in force (and without revoking and replacing it), vary the direction under subsections (4) and (5)(b) in line with subsections (1) and (2) , if the variation made is one that the health centre manager of the prison recommends is desirable to address the at-risk prisoner’s risk of self-harm, and the variation made varies the direction— a from one that restricts association to one that denies association; or b from one that denies association to one that restricts association. 7B The direction as varied under subsection (7A) must, under section 57(2) , be no more restrictive than is reasonably necessary to ensure the maintenance of the law and the safety of the public, corrections staff, and the at-risk prisoner. 7C Before a health centre manager makes a recommendation under subsection (7A) that relates to a matter outside their scope of practice, they must consult a registered health professional whose scope of practice includes that matter ( see also section 61G on the manager giving advice). 7D A variation under subsection (7A) (and subsections (4) and (5)(b) ) is part of, and must be read with, the direction concerned. 7E If a variation is made under subsection (7A) to a direction given under this section, the prison manager must (as required by subsection (3)(a) and (b) ) ensure that— a the at-risk prisoner is promptly given the reasons in writing for the variation; and b the chief executive is promptly be informed in writing of the variation and the reasons for it. 7F Subsections (7A) to (7E) do not limit the generality of the power of variation in subsection (4) . Visits by registered health professional 8 While a direction under this section is in force, the health centre manager must, unless the health centre manager is satisfied that it is not necessary in the circumstances, ensure that a registered health professional visits the prisoner concerned at least once a day. 9 As part of the visit referred to in subsection (8) , the registered health professional must consider and advise the health centre manager— a of any matters relevant to the continuing justification for a direction under this section; and b whether the prisoner’s at-risk assessment should be reviewed. 17 Section 69 amended (Minimum entitlements) In section 69(1)(i), after section 77(3) , insert or (3A) . Before section 69(4)(aa), insert: aaa may be denied, for not more than 2 consecutive days at a time, the minimum entitlement referred to in subsection (1)(a) if, after having taken all reasonable steps to provide the entitlement, the prison manager believes on reasonable grounds that any of the following circumstances apply, and have the effect that, in the opinion of the prison manager, it is not reasonably practicable to provide the entitlement: i there exists a current and real risk to prison security, the health or safety of any person, or both (for example, because of the carrying out of reasonable and lawful searches anywhere in the prison); or ii the prisoner is being transferred between prisons: aab may be denied, for a period of time that is reasonable in the circumstances, the minimum entitlement referred to in subsection (1)(a) if, in the opinion of the prison manager, it is not reasonably practicable to provide the entitlement because the prison manager believes on reasonable grounds that the prisoner is awaiting, or is being provided with, medical, or other health-related, assessment or treatment (for example, dental assessment or treatment) at the health centre or at another location in or outside the prison: In section 69(4)(aa)(i), after temporarily removed from prison under section 62 , insert (other than to obtain medical, or other health-related, assessment or treatment) . After section 69(4), insert: 4A A denial under subsection (2)(a) or (b) or (4)(aaa), (aab) , or (aa) of a prisoner’s entitlement under subsection (1)(a) must be— a approved in advance by the prison manager, or by the prison manager’s delegate, unless it is not reasonably practicable to do so (for example, because of unplanned prison or unit search operations, or unplanned medical appointments); and b recorded clearly by the prison manager, or by the prison manager’s delegate, in order to facilitate national monitoring and analysis by the department of every denial of any of those kinds. 4B A denial under subsection (2)(a) or (b) or (4)(aaa), (aab), or (aa) of a prisoner’s entitlement under subsection (1)(a), and that it is impracticable for the prison manager, or the prison manager’s delegate, to approve in advance under subsection (4A)(a) , must be— a approved or discontinued by them as soon as is reasonably practicable; and b recorded clearly by them, along with a record of the reasons why it was not reasonably practicable for them to approve it in advance, in order to facilitate national monitoring and analysis by the department of every denial of any of those kinds. After section 69(6), insert: 7 This section does not limit section 69A (minimum meaningful human contact). 18 New section 69A inserted (Minimum meaningful human contact) After section 69, insert: 69A Minimum meaningful human contact What section does 1 This section sets out a rule for prohibiting prolonged solitary confinement, and also sets out other entitlements to minimum meaningful human contact. Rule prohibiting prolonged solitary confinement 1A A prisoner must not be subjected to prolonged solitary confinement. 1B For the purposes of subsection (1A) ,— prolonged solitary confinement means solitary confinement for a time period in excess of 15 consecutive days solitary confinement means the confinement of a prisoner for 22 hours or more a day without the opportunity to receive meaningful human contact. Other entitlements to minimum meaningful human contact 2 A prisoner must be given the opportunity to receive at least 10 hours of meaningful human contact in each 14-day a time period of 14 consecutive days . 2A A prisoner must be given the opportunity to receive at least 2 hours of meaningful human contact in a time period of 7 consecutive days. Duty to take into account that at least 14 hours of contact each week desirable 3 In managing a prisoner, the department (for example, the prison manager and a staff member of a prison) must take into account that, while not an entitlement, it is still desirable that the prisoner be given the opportunity to receive at least 14 hours of meaningful human contact in each week. Meaningful human contact 4 In this Act, meaningful human contact , for a prisoner, means contact by the prisoner with 1 or more other individuals (whether other prisoners, visitors, officers, or others) that— a enables the prisoner’s social interaction and stimulation by enabling the prisoner to engage with (for example, talk with ) the 1 or more other individuals: b is more than fleeting or incidental to contact for other purposes , whether or not the contact occurs in the course of another activity (for example, during delivery of food or medication): c is offered under subsection (5) and is any of the following: i face-to-face contact, for example,— A via an audiovisual link; or B in person via a physical barrier (for example, a physical barrier that is, or includes, glass or mesh); or C in person and not via a physical barrier: ii contact by telephone call . made by any telephone facility provided for the use of prisoners under section 77(1) or (2) and (8)(a) (and so excluding any audiovisual link referred to in section 77(8)(b) ). Determining what kind of contact is offered under this section to prisoner 5 In deciding, for the purposes of subsection (4)(c) , what kind of contact is offered under this section, relevant factors are— a the availability of reasonably suitable spaces and facilities: b that meaningful human contact can occur in the cell, or self-care unit, in which the prisoner is placed: c that it is desirable for the prisoner to have a mix of contact of all of the different kinds specified in subsection (4)(c)(i) and (ii) : d in particular, that it is desirable for the prisoner not to have contact only by telephone call (as specified in subsection (4)(c)(ii) ): e that it is desirable for the prisoner to be asked how the prisoner would prefer to have meaningful human contact, and for any preferences the prisoner expresses in response to be taken into account: f all or any circumstances specified in subsection (6)(a) to (d) : g any other factors that do or may affect that decision. 5A In deciding, for the purposes of subsection (4)(c) , what kind of contact is offered under this section,— a the prisoner must, if practicable, be asked if they have any preferences relating to what kind of contact is offered under this section; and b the prisoner’s preferences (if any) must be taken into account alongside operational, safety, security, and resource considerations. 5B If the prisoner’s opportunity to associate with other prisoners has been denied or restricted in accordance with section 58, 60, or 61CA for a period of more than 14 consecutive days, then the prison manager must record how the prisoner’s entitlements under this section will be facilitated. Exceptions 6 A prisoner may be denied, for a period of time that is reasonable in the circumstances, the minimum contact under subsection  (1A), (2) , or (2A) if— a there is an emergency in the prison; or b the security of the prison is threatened; or c the health centre manager of the prison concerned considers that the health of the prisoner is threatened; or d the safety of the prisoner or of any other person is threatened. Relationship with minimum entitlements 7 This section does not limit section 69 (minimum entitlements). United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, Rules 43(1)(b) and 44 18A Section 70 amended (Exercise) After section 70(2), insert: 3 The prisoner takes the physical exercise referred to in subsection (1) in the open air for the purposes of subsection (2) even if the prisoner takes that physical exercise in an area (for example, in a yard) that— a has security features (for example, solid walls, bars, or mesh); and b may, but need not, have overhead features (for example, all or any of overhead bars, overhead mesh, and roofing features (for example, partial roofing)). After section 70(3) , insert: 3A The physical exercise referred to in subsections (1) to (3) is sufficiently provided to a prisoner (other than a designated-management prisoner, or any other prisoner, to whom subsection (4) applies) if that physical exercise is provided to that prisoner— a in a single-prisoner yard; or b in an exercise yard that is larger than a single-prisoner yard. 4 The physical exercise referred to in subsections (1) to (3) is sufficiently provided to a designated-management prisoner, or to any other prisoner, who has been provided with exercise in a single-prisoner yard for 15 or more consecutive days (whether or not that designated management prisoner’s, or other prisoner’s, opportunity to associate with other prisoners has been denied or restricted in accordance with this Act or regulations made under this Act for all or any of those 15 or more consecutive days) if— a that physical exercise is provided to that prisoner in a single-prisoner yard; and b the condition in subsection (5) is also complied with, unless that condition does not apply under subsection (6) . 5 The condition mentioned in subsection (4)(b) is that the prisoner also receives regular opportunities to take that physical exercise in an exercise yard that is larger than a single-prisoner yard. 6 For the purposes of subsection (4)(b) , the condition mentioned in subsection (5) does not apply if the prison manager is satisfied that— a the opportunity to use an exercise yard that is larger than a single-prisoner yard for that physical exercise is likely to affect negatively the health or safety of the prisoner, any other person, or both; or b the prisoner is, for all or any of the 15 or more consecutive days mentioned in subsection (4) , segregated under section 60 , or 61CA , or both; or c the prisoner must be separated from other prisoners in order to comply with a penalty imposed on the prisoner for an offence against discipline; or d all of paragraphs (a) to (c) apply, or a combination of any of them applies. 7 The prison manager, or the prison manager’s delegate, must record clearly when they rely on an exception in subsection (6)(a) to (d) (and therefore, under subsection (4)(b) , do not comply with the condition in subsection (5) ), in order to facilitate national monitoring and analysis by the department of reliance on the exceptions in subsection (6)(a) to (d) . 8 A single-prisoner yard , in this section, means a yard that— a is designed for use only by a single prisoner; and b may, but need not, be adjacent to the cell in which the prisoner is held or placed. 19 Section 77 amended (Outgoing telephone calls) Replace section 77(3) with: 3 Every prisoner who is not a designated-management prisoner is entitled to make per week at least 1 outgoing telephone call whose duration is at least 5 minutes. 3A Every prisoner who is a designated-management prisoner is entitled to make per week at least 1 or more outgoing telephone calls whose duration (as the 1 call, or as the 2 or more calls combined) is at least 2 hours. After section 77(7), insert: 8 In this section, a telephone facility — a means any telephone system, or audio link, that under subsection (1) or (2) every corrections prison, or Police jail, must have for prisoners to make telephone calls; but b includes any audiovisual link, whether inside or outside a prison, that a particular prisoner is permitted to use by a person under whose control or supervision the particular prisoner is. 19A New cross-heading above section 78 inserted Above section 78, insert: Prisoners’ information and education needs 20 Section 102 amended (Reporting of unauthorised items discovered, certain searches, and placement in dry cells) In section 102(2),— a replace section 98(3)(a) with section 98D(1) ; and b replace section 98(9) with section 98F . 21 Section 171 amended (Reporting responsibilities) In section 171(2)(e), replace sections 98 and 101 with sections 98 to 98F and 101 . 22 Section 201 amended (Regulations relating to good management of corrections system) Replace section 201(c) with: c regulating the opening of bank accounts (that is, trust accounts required by section 46) into which money intended for a particular prisoner may be deposited, regulating the operation of those trust accounts (including deposits into them and withdrawals or other payments from them), and regulating the closing of those trust accounts: 23 New section 201A inserted (Regulations regulating operation of prisoner trust accounts may authorise prison manager to refuse to approve deposit, or to prevent withdrawal, if satisfied that prescribed grounds apply to transaction) After section 201, insert: 201A Regulations regulating operation of prisoner trust accounts may authorise prison manager to refuse to approve deposit, or to prevent withdrawal, if satisfied that prescribed grounds apply to transaction Regulations to which this section applies 1 This section applies to regulations— a made under sections 200(1)(a) and 201(c) ; and b regulating the operation of trust accounts required by section 46. Regulations may authorise prison manager to refuse to approve deposit, or to prevent withdrawal, if satisfied that prescribed grounds apply to transaction 2 The regulations may regulate the operation of those trust accounts by authorising the prison a manager of a prison (which may, but need not, be the manager of the prison in which the prisoner is detained) — a to refuse to approve a deposit into a trust account in respect of a particular prisoner if— i the regulations require the a prison manager’s approval for the transaction; and ii the a prison manager is satisfied that grounds prescribed in the regulations apply to the transaction: b to prevent a withdrawal from a trust account in respect of a particular prisoner if — a prison manager is satisfied that grounds prescribed in the regulations apply to the transaction. i the withdrawal is in respect of a prisoner and with the prisoner’s approval (not because money has been wrongly credited to the account, or is withdrawn in accordance with requirements in, or in regulations made under, this Act); and ii the prison manager is satisfied that grounds prescribed in the regulations apply to the transaction. Regulations may also regulate operation in any other way, or other ways 3 Subsection (2) does not limit the generality of the power under sections 200(1)(a) and 201(c) for the regulations to regulate in any other way or ways the operation of trust accounts required by section 46. 24 Schedule 1AA amended In Schedule 1AA,— a insert the Part set out in Schedule 1 of this Act as the last Part; and b make all necessary consequential amendments. 25 New Schedule 1AB inserted After Schedule 1AA, insert the Schedule 1AB set out in Schedule 2 of this Act. 26 Principal regulations This Part amends the Corrections Regulations 2005. However, sections 29 , 29A, and 30 amend regulation 25 of the Corrections Amendment Regulations 2025. The amendments made by sections 29 , 29A, and 30 form part of Part 4A of the Corrections Regulations 2005 for the purposes of clause 7 of Schedule 1AA of those regulations (Risk categories assigned to remand prisoners before commencement of Part 4A). 27 Regulation 41 amended (Trust accounts in respect of prisoners) Revoke regulation 41(2). 28 Regulation 42 replaced (Trust account deposits and withdrawals) Replace regulation 42 with: 42 Trust account deposits 1 No money may be deposited into a trust account in respect of a particular prisoner detained in a prison unless the manager of the prison a manager of a prison (which may, but need not, be the prison in which the prisoner is detained) gives approval for the deposit. 2 Subclause (1) is subject to regulation 43(1) (which requires earnings paid to a prisoner under section 66(3) of the Act to be deposited into the trust account). 3 The A prison manager may refuse to approve a deposit into a trust account in respect of a particular prisoner if the a prison manager is satisfied that all or any of the following prescribed grounds apply to the transaction: a the transaction is likely to adversely affect all or any of the following: i the security, good order, or discipline of the prison: ii the safety or welfare of any prisoner: iii public safety, including the safety or welfare of any individual: iv the maintenance of the law: b the transaction is likely to constitute an offence: c the transaction is inconsistent with any requirements imposed by rules made under section 46A of the Act. 42A Trust account withdrawals 1 Money may be withdrawn from the trust account only if a manager of a prison (which may, but need not, be the prison in which the prisoner is detained) is satisfied that — a it has been wrongly credited to the account; or b it is withdrawn in respect of a prisoner with the prisoner’s approval; or c it is withdrawn in accordance with regulation 43(2) or section 46(3) or 68 of the Act. 2 However, the a prison manager may prevent a withdrawal (in respect of a prisoner with the prisoner’s approval) under subclause (1)(b) if the a prison manager is satisfied that all or any of the following prescribed grounds apply to the transaction: a the transaction is likely to adversely affect all or any of the following: i the security, good order, or discipline of the prison: ii the safety or welfare of any prisoner: iii public safety, including the safety or welfare of any individual: iv the maintenance of the law: b the transaction is likely to constitute an offence: c the transaction is inconsistent with any requirements imposed by rules made under section 46A of the Act. 29 Regulation 43A amended (Principles of risk assessment for remand prisoners) Before regulation 43A(1) (as set out in regulation 25 of the Corrections Amendment Regulations 2025), insert: Lowest risk category for remand prisoner’s safe and secure management Replace regulation 43A(2) (as set out in regulation 25 of the Corrections Amendment Regulations 2025) with: Remand prisoner placement and management consistent with risk category 2 A requirement in subclause (3) applies— a to a remand prisoner who has been assigned a risk category; and b only to the extent that complying with it is practicable (having regard to the availability of accommodation and other resources); and c only while the remand prisoner is not, and so is not subject to placement and other restrictive management as, a designated-management prisoner. 3 The placement and management of the remand prisoner must be informed by (that is, decided after considering all relevant considerations, including, without limitation) the remand prisoner’s risk category. 29A Regulation 43B amended (Duty to carry out risk assessment of remand prisoner) After regulation 43B(1) (as set out in regulation 25 of the Corrections Amendment Regulations 2025), insert: 1A However, subclause (1) applies to a remand prisoner who has been remanded in custody in any corrections prison for a continuous period of 14 days only while the prisoner is not, and so is not subject to placement and other restrictive management as, a designated-management prisoner. 30 Regulation 43F amended (Duty to review risk category) In regulation 43F (as set out in regulation 25 of the Corrections Amendment Regulations 2025), after The risk category assigned to a remand prisoner , insert other than a remand prisoner who is a designated-management prisoner . In regulation 46F 43F (as set out in regulation 25 of the Corrections Amendment Regulations 2025), insert as subclauses (2) and (3): 2 For the purposes of subclause (1)(a) and (b)(ii), a significant change in the remand prisoner’s circumstances that could impact the risk category assigned to them occurs if the interim or final designation of the remand prisoner as a designated-management prisoner expires or is revoked. 3 Subclause (2) does not limit the generality of subclause (1)(a) and (b)(ii). 31 Regulation 44 amended (Principles of security classification) Before regulation 44(1), insert: Classification at lowest level for prisoner’s safe and secure management Replace regulation 44(2) with: Prisoner placement and management consistent with classification 2 A requirement in subclause (3) applies— a to a prisoner who has been assigned a security classification; and b only to the extent that complying with it is practicable (having regard to the availability of accommodation and other resources); and c only while the prisoner is not, and so is not subject to placement and other restrictive management as, a designated-management prisoner. 3 The prisoner must be placed and managed in a way that is consistent with the prisoner’s security classification. 32 New Part 5B inserted After regulation 52N, insert: 5B Designated-management prisoner cells 52O Mandatory items, features, and standards for designated-management prisoner cells 1 Cells used to accommodate designated-management prisoners must have the items and features specified in Part AA of Schedule 2 . 2 The prison manager must ensure that the items and features specified in Part AA of Schedule 2 that are provided for use in, or form part of, a cell to which this regulation applies are maintained in good working order. 33 Part 6 heading amended In the Part 6 heading, after Segregation of prisoners , insert , at-risk cells, and at-risk prisoners . 34 Regulation 53 amended (Application) In the heading to regulation 53, replace Application with Part applies to authorise segregation only under segregation direction . In regulation 53, replace made under any of sections 58 to 60 of the Act with (as defined in regulation 3) . 35 Regulation 57 amended (Mandatory items, features, and standards for segregation accommodation and at-risk cells) In regulation 57(1), after Cells , insert (other than at-risk cells) . In regulation 57(2), after At-risk cells , insert (whether or not they are used to accommodate prisoners subject to a segregation direction, designated-management prisoners, or both) . In regulation 57(3), replace this regulation with subclause (1) or (2) . 36 Regulation 65AAA replaced Replace regulation 65AAA with: 65AAA Case management plans for certain prisoners Application 1 This regulation applies to every prisoner who is— a sentenced to imprisonment for a term of more than 2 months; or b in custody on remand for a continuous period of more than 2 months. Requirements: every prisoner 2 The case management plan devised for the prisoner under section 51 of the Act must— a be tailored to the individual prisoner and include an assessment of the needs, capacities, and disposition of the prisoner; and b make provision for the safe, secure, and humane treatment of the prisoner; and c outline how the prisoner can make constructive use of their time in the prison (including, in the case of a person sentenced to imprisonment, ways of addressing offending behaviour and preventing reoffending); and d outline how the prisoner may , if appropriate, be prepared for eventual release from the prison and successful reintegration into the community; and e be consistent with the resources available to the chief executive to manage the prisoner. Additional requirements: every designated-management prisoner 2A The case management plan for every designated-management prisoner must also reflect how that prisoner is provided (if it is appropriate, and to the extent that it is reasonable and practicable, in the circumstances) with— a opportunities for that prisoner’s rehabilitation: b constructive activities: c planning for the reintegration of that prisoner into the community. Review 3 The case management plan must be reviewed whenever there is a significant change in the prisoner’s circumstances. 4 In subclause (3) , a significant change in the prisoner’s circumstances includes, without limitation, when the interim or final designation of the prisoner as a designated-management prisoner expires or is revoked. Designated-management prisoners 65AAB Designated-management prisoners: opportunities to reduce restrictive management The prison manager must be able to demonstrate whether, and if so, how, opportunities are provided to a designated-management prisoner to reduce the level of restrictive management to which that prisoner is subject. 37 Regulation 67 amended (Facilities for cells and self-care units) Replace regulation 67(6) with: 6 This regulation does not apply to— a cells used to accommodate prisoners subject to a segregation direction: b transit cells: c at-risk cells. 38 Regulation 183 amended (Prison to contact nominated person) After regulation 183(1)(a), insert: aaa a designated-management prisoner; or aa an at-risk prisoner; or In regulation 183(3)(a) and (b), after the prisoner’s segregation , insert , designation as a designated-management prisoner , placement in an at-risk cell ( see section 61B(a) of the Act), . 39 Schedule 1AA amended In Schedule 1AA,— a insert the Part set out in Schedule 3 of this Act as the last Part; and b make all necessary consequential amendments. 40 Schedule 2 amended Amend Schedule 2 as set out in Schedule 4 of this Act. 1 New Part 2 inserted into Schedule 1AA of Corrections Act 2004 2 Provisions relating to Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Act 2026 6 Interpretation 1 In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,— amendment Act means the Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Act 2026 commencement , in relation to a provision of the amendment Act, means the commencement of the provision. 2 In this Part,— a a reference to a new provision is one to that provision as amended, inserted, or replaced by the amendment Act; and b a reference to an old provision is one to that provision as in force immediately before it is so amended, inserted, or replaced. 7 Application of prisoners’ property amendments New sections 45, 45AA , 46, 46A , and 201(c) apply, after commencement, only to, and to a trust account in which money is held exclusively for, a person whose legal custody as a prisoner— a started before commencement, and is in force immediately before commencement; or b starts on or after commencement. 8 Application of segregation amendments 1 New sections 3A, 57, 58, 59, 59A, 60, and 61CA apply, after commencement, only to— a a direction that is given under old sections 58, 59, 60, and 61CA before commencement, and that is in force immediately before commencement: b a direction that is given on or after commencement. 2 In particular, new section 59A(5) applies, after commencement, to a prisoner even if some or all of the relevant period determined under new section 59A(5) occurred before the commencement, so long as that period ends on or after the commencement. 3 However, for the first 12 months after commencement, the department may comply with either of the following: a old sections 58, 59, 60, and 61CA as in force immediately before commencement; or b new sections 3A, 57, 58, 59, 59A, 60, and 61CA . 8A Application of physical exercise amendments New sections 69(2A), (4)(aaa) and (aab), and (4A) and 70(3A) to (8) apply, after commencement, only to— a a prisoner whose legal custody started before commencement, and is in force immediately before commencement: b a prisoner whose legal custody starts on or after commencement. 9 Application of minimum meaningful human contact amendments New sections 69(7) and 69A apply, after commencement, only to— a a prisoner whose legal custody started before commencement, and is in force immediately before commencement: b a prisoner whose legal custody starts on or after commencement. 9A Application of telephone facility definition amendment New section 77(8) applies, after commencement, only to— a a prisoner whose legal custody started before commencement, and is in force immediately before commencement: b a prisoner whose legal custody starts on or after commencement. 10 Application of designated-management prisoner amendments 1 New sections 3(1), 47, 54, 52A to 52M , 54, 69, 77 (3) and (3A) , and new Schedule 1AB apply, after commencement, only to— a a prisoner whose legal custody started before commencement, and is in force immediately before commencement: b a prisoner whose legal custody starts on or after commencement. 2 This clause is subject to clause 11 (transitional provisions for designated-management prisoner amendments). 11 Transitional provisions for designated-management prisoner amendments 1 The new provisions in clause 10 relating to designated-management prisoners apply, for the first 6 months after commencement, only for— a appointing members of the Panel: b bringing into operation processes necessary or desirable to enable the Panel to perform its function after the end of those 6 months: c enabling the chief executive to consider making in those 6 months an interim designation in respect of a person that commences on or after the end of those 6 months. 2 An interim designation mentioned in subclause (1)(c) may expire up to 6 months after it comes into force (despite new section 52J(2)(a) ), unless earlier revoked, or the person earlier ceases to be in the legal custody of the chief executive, for example, because the person — a earlier ceases to be remanded in custody; or b is earlier released on parole; or c earlier ceases to be serving a sentence of imprisonment. 3 However, an expiry date under subclause (2) — a is available only for an interim designation made in the 12 months after commencement of the new provisions specified in clause 10 ; and b must be an expiry date no later than the end of those 12 months. 2 New Schedule 1AB inserted into Corrections Act 2004 1AB ss 52A, 52G, 52H, 52I, 52K Designated-Management Prisoner Advisory Panel 1 Establishment of Panel The Designated-Management Prisoner Advisory Panel is established. 2 Function of Panel 1 The function of the Panel is, when requested to do so, to make a recommendation that the chief executive (as the case requires)— a make or replace or not make or replace a final designation designating a person as a designated-management prisoner; or b on a review, or the expiry, of an in-force final designation, amend, revoke, or replace, or not amend, revoke, or replace, the designation. 2 The Panel’s recommendation must be consistent with all provisions of sections 52A to 52M that apply to the chief executive’s relevant decision. 3 Membership of Panel 1 The Panel consists of members who are appointed by the chief executive by written notice. 2 The Panel must include— a 1 independent member who is appointed as chairperson; and b 1 or more acting chairpersons (each of whom is a n independent member who may be able to act as the chairperson if the chairperson is unavailable); and c sufficient other members to enable the Panel to carry out its function efficiently and effectively. 3 Before appointing a person as a member, the chief executive must be satisfied that— a the person has suitable qualifications, knowledge or understanding, and ability, to help enable the Panel to perform its function; and b members that have been, or are to be, appointed have collectively suitable qualifications, knowledge or understanding, and ability, to enable the Panel to carry out its function efficiently and effectively. 4 The following must be appointed as a member of the Panel who is independent from the Minister, the chief executive, every employee of the department, and every officer (an independent member ): a a member appointed as chairperson: b a member appointed as an acting chairperson. 4 Chairperson and acting chairperson 1 A member appointed as chairperson, or as an acting chairperson, must be a barrister or solicitor of the High Court of not less than 7 years’ practice. 2 However, the member need not hold, at or after the time that their appointment as chairperson, or as an acting chairperson, is made or takes effect, a practising certificate as a barrister, or as a barrister and solicitor. 5 Meetings and recommendations of Panel 1 The quorum necessary for any meeting of the Panel— a is 5 members; and b must include the chairperson or acting chairperson. 2 The recommendation of the majority of members in attendance at a meeting is the recommendation of the Panel (and, if those members are split evenly, the chairperson or acting chairperson has a casting vote). 3 The Panel may come to a recommendation without hearing from any person, unless the Panel wishes to hear an oral statement from any person. 3A The Panel’s recommendation must be recorded and must include— a details of the Panel’s members; and b the reasons why the Panel made the Panel’s recommendation; and c if the Panel is split, any other recommendation that a member would make instead, and the reasons why that member would make it. 4 The Panel’s recommendation that the chief executive make or replace a final designation must include the recommended duration of the designation or replacement designation (which, under section 52J(3) , must not exceed 2 years after it comes into force). 5 The Panel may regulate its own procedures not provided for by this Act. 6 Information Panel must consider in deciding its recommendation In making the Panel’s recommendation, the Panel must consider the following information in respect of the person considered for designation: aaa how the department has in the past managed, and is currently managing, the person as a prisoner: aab the current risks posed by the person as a prisoner that the department needs to manage: aac any other relevant and available information relating to— i the person’s health and welfare; or ii the likely impact of designation on their health and welfare: a any written information or written submissions provided by, or on behalf of, the person before a reasonable deadline specified for the purpose (which must be at least 14 days after receipt by the person of the notice required to be given to them under section 52I(1)(b)(iii) ) : b any information provided in any oral hearings of an oral statement under clause 5(3) : c the person’s current and historical segregation status (if any): d the person’s current and historical risk assessment as a remand prisoner (if any): e the person’s current and historical security classification (if any): f the person’s current and previous convictions, sentences, or other dispositions, including (without limitation) sentencing notes and pre-sentence reports: g any current or potential charges against the person that have not yet resulted in any conviction, sentence, or other disposition, including (without limitation) sentencing notes and pre-sentence reports: h any other relevant and available information relating to— i the person’s health and welfare; or ii the likely impact of designation on their health and welfare: i any report— i from the department to the Panel; and ii about the Panel’s recommendation: j any other information that is, or on the Panel’s request is made, available to the Panel, and that it considers relevant to its recommendation. 7 Term of appointment, and reappointment 1 Every member of the Panel, including the chairperson, must be appointed for a term of 3 years or less. 2 A member continues in office despite the expiry of the member’s term of office until— a the member is reappointed; or b the member’s successor is appointed. 3 A member who participates in a recommendation that is not complete on the date that the member ceases to be in office may complete the member’s participation in the recommendation after that date and is, for that purpose, taken to be in office until the recommendation is complete. 4 Any member may be reappointed any number of times. 5 A member may at any time resign from office by written notice to the chief executive. 6 The chief executive may at any time remove a member from office for just cause. 7 The member is not entitled to compensation for loss of office. 8 Remuneration and expenses 1 Every member of the Panel must be paid fees and expenses in accordance with the fees framework. 2 In this clause, the fees framework means the framework determined by the Government from time to time for the classification and remuneration of statutory and other bodies in which the Crown has an interest. 9 Panel member not employed in service of Crown for stated purposes A person is not employed in the service of the Crown, for the purposes of the Public Service Act 2020 or the Government Superannuation Fund Act 1956, merely as a result of being a member of the Panel. 10 Immunity of members No member of the Panel is personally liable for any act or omission done in performance, or intended performance, of the Panel’s function, unless the act or omission was done in bad faith. 1AB Designated-Management Prisoner Advisory Panel 3 New Part 2 inserted into Schedule 1AA of Corrections Regulations 2005 2 Provisions relating to Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Act 2026 8 Interpretation 1 In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires,— amendment Act means the Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Act 2026 commencement , in relation to a provision of the amendment Act, means the commencement of the provision. 2 In this Part, a reference to a new provision is a reference to that provision as amended, inserted, or replaced by the amendment Act. 9 Application of prisoners’ property amendments New regulations 42 and 42A apply, after commencement, only to, and to the prisoner trust account of, a person whose legal custody as a prisoner— a started before commencement, and is in force immediately before commencement; or b starts on or after commencement. 10 Application of designated-management prisoner and designated-management prisoner cell amendments New regulations 43A, 43B, 43F, 44, new Part 5B, new regulations 65AAA and 65AAB , and new Schedule 2 apply, after commencement, only to— a a prisoner whose legal custody started before commencement, and is in force immediately before commencement: b a prisoner whose legal custody starts on or after commencement. 11 Application of amendments relating to segregation The new Part 6 heading and new regulations 53, 57, 67, and 183 apply, after commencement, only to— a a prisoner whose legal custody started before commencement, and is in force immediately before commencement: b a prisoner whose legal custody starts on or after commencement. 4 Amendments to Schedule 2 of Corrections Regulations 2005 In the Schedule 2 heading, after Items and features , insert of designated-management prisoner cells and . In the Schedule 2 heading, replace rr 57, 59, 60, 61 with rr 52O , 57, 59, 60, 61 . In Schedule 2, before Part A, insert: AA Items and features prescribed for designated-management prisoner cells Artificial lighting Automatic fire detector Bed Cell-adjacent yard that— receives fresh air; and is attached to, and can be accessed directly from, the cell Desk with seating Fresh or conditioned air General power outlet Hand-washing facilities Heating as appropriate for climatic conditions Intercom, alarm, or call button Privacy screening Reflective surface (such as polished stainless steel) for personal grooming Running potable water Shelving Storage for authorised property Toilet

Hansard

April 28, 2026

Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill — First Reading · Full day report

First Reading Hon MARK MITCHELL (Minister of Corrections) (14:56): I move, That the Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill be now read a first time. I nominate the Justice Committee to consider the bill. At the appropriate time, I intend to move that the bill be reported to the House by 3 September 2026. The bill, as tabled in the House in March, underscores this Government’s commitment to restoring law and order. It will see real and practical steps taken to enhance prison and public safety, and it creates a clearer and stronger legislative framework to manage prisoners who pose an extreme risk to prison and public safety, while balancing natural justice. In recent years, Corrections has been focused on ensuring that it minimises the risks posed by a small number of prisoners who pose an extreme threat to others. For example, their history of serious violence towards others, their connection to transnational organised crime, or the risk that their ideology poses to prison or public safety. At the same time, it is important for Corrections’ legislative powers to adequately provide the necessary management tools and protections to manage these…
Read full Hansard debate
First Reading Hon MARK MITCHELL (Minister of Corrections) (14:56): I move, That the Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill be now read a first time. I nominate the Justice Committee to consider the bill. At the appropriate time, I intend to move that the bill be reported to the House by 3 September 2026. The bill, as tabled in the House in March, underscores this Government’s commitment to restoring law and order. It will see real and practical steps taken to enhance prison and public safety, and it creates a clearer and stronger legislative framework to manage prisoners who pose an extreme risk to prison and public safety, while balancing natural justice. In recent years, Corrections has been focused on ensuring that it minimises the risks posed by a small number of prisoners who pose an extreme threat to others. For example, their history of serious violence towards others, their connection to transnational organised crime, or the risk that their ideology poses to prison or public safety. At the same time, it is important for Corrections’ legislative powers to adequately provide the necessary management tools and protections to manage these prisons. This bill creates a comprehensive legislative framework for the safe and lawful management of prisoners who pose an extreme risk to prison and/or public safety while in prison. Currently, these prisoners are held in the Prisoners of Extreme Risk Unit in Auckland Prison. They require a high level of custodial management to minimise risks they pose to staff and others in prison and/or to the public. This bill enables the Corrections chief executive to make both interim and final determinations about whether a prisoner should be a designated management prisoner. The final decision itself is informed by an expert advisory panel’s recommendation and the information they considered, and any other information the chief executive considers relevant. A designated management prisoner will likely be subject to more restrictions than other prisoners. For example, they are likely to receive fewer hours of unlock and fewer contact visits. Corrections is also likely to monitor their communications more intensively for intelligence purposes to identify risks to the prison or public safety. While the bill has focused on protecting the safety of the community and good order of prisons, it balances natural justice. To ensure natural justice, the prisoner must be notified, as soon as reasonably practicable, that an advisory panel is considering whether to recommend that they be designated management prisoners. They then have the right to provide any written information to inform the panel’s deliberations. Once the prisoner has been designated, the chief executive must provide them with a written summary of the reasons why. The prisoner can request a judicial review of the decision, and the Corrections chief executive is also required to review the designation if new and relevant information comes to light, or there has been a change in circumstances that may make the determination inappropriate or unnecessary. The bill strikes a balanced approach that safeguards public and prison safety while managing the designated management prisoners’ welfare. Designated management prisoners will be in specific cells that give them more personal space, with each cell having its own self-contained yard. They’ll also be able to make at least two hours of phone calls each week, more than the minimum five-minute entitlement for the general prison population. These important provisions aim to mitigate the potential impact of other restrictive measures. “Designated-management” prisoners—in fact, all prisoners—will also be supported by the bill’s move to explicitly prohibit prolonged solitary confinement. The bill explicitly provides for prisoners to receive 10 hours of meaningful human contact over each 14-day period, while also requiring Corrections to aim for considerably more: 14 hours of meaningful human contact each week. For the avoidance of doubt, “meaningful human contact” is contact by the prisoner with one or more, or other, persons—for example, other prisoners, corrections staff, or visitors. That enables social interaction and stimulation. This is more than fleeting or incidental contact and could be face-to-face contact or contact via a telephone call or audiovisual link. The bill also takes action to minimise the risk of prisoner trust accounts being used for illicit activities. I understand that some prisoners use prisoner trust accounts for activities that can undermine prison or public safety. The bill enhances Corrections’ oversight of these transactions, which should minimise the risk of prisoner-to-prisoner intimidation and influence, and financial coercion, and other illicit activities relating to prisoner trust accounts. The bill also makes practical changes to facilitate more efficient Corrections operations in several areas. Prison managers will be able to more easily vary prisoners’ ability to associate with others, based on their risk. This greater flexibility will improve operational efficiency and allow managers to tailor association conditions to individual risk levels. It will also enable prisoners who no longer require the highest level of restriction to move from denied association to restricted association more readily. As a result, fewer prisoners should experience unnecessarily limited social contact, while those who do require strict controls will continue to have them. In some circumstances, prison managers will also be required to treat multiple subsequent segregation directions under the Act as a single continuous period, provided that prisoners move between the same direction within a five-day period. This will enhance oversight of prisoners’ circumstances over extended periods of segregation and supports the lawful and humane management of prisoners. The bill also makes minor but important amendments to the disposal and destruction of prisoner property provisions. Currently, prisoners must be present whenever an item of the property is destroyed, which is very impractical. This bill changes that so that Corrections can destroy a prisoner’s property without them being present, provided that the prisoner has written notice that their property is going to be destroyed, with a specified period available for the prisoner to respond to that decision. This is a technical change to better reflect operational realities. The type of property that would be destroyed is already listed in the Act: alcohol, controlled drugs, as well as dangerous, objectionable, or perishable items. A more substantive change is that the bill protects public safety by enabling the destruction of a prisoner’s property who was designated as a terrorist entity at the time of their death. The Prime Minister can designate someone as a terrorist entity under the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002 if they believe on reasonable grounds that the person has knowingly carried out a terrorist act. Currently, Corrections manages only one prisoner with this designation. There may be some situations where the property of a prisoner who has been designated as a terrorist entity may cause harm if it gets released into the community. As an example, the property may cause harm to victims even when the item is not in and of itself an inherently harmful item but is just by the fact of who owned that item. For this reason, the bill allows Corrections to apply to the High Court for an order to destroy this property when the person has passed away, provided the court is satisfied that the property may cause harm if it is circulated in the community. I want to conclude by thanking all those who contributed to the development of this bill. It is great to see this important work progress to this stage. I look forward to seeing us debating the bill in more detail during the committee of the whole House. I commend this bill to the House. CAMILLA BELICH (Labour) (15:04): Thank you. Mr Speaker. This is a really difficult bill in many ways, because it is dealing with the conditions of some of the people who would probably deserve the least amount of sympathy from the public. This bill originated, as I understand, from concerns that were raised by the Ombudsman in late, I think, 2024, and there was a very strongly worded report drafted by the then Ombudsman around the conditions of prisoners who form part of this unit—these prisoners of extreme risk, who, under this bill, will be “designated-management prisoners”. When the Ombudsman looked into this unit, the findings were quite difficult for the Ombudsman to reconcile with the international agreements that New Zealand has signed up to and, additionally, with the values that he reported to recognise in New Zealand as a nation. Some of the comments that were in that report was that the unit was found to be “oppressive”; he said he found human rights abuses; he said there are examples of the use of force; and there was cruel and inhumane and degrading treatment. Obviously, this was something taken seriously by the Government, and I think it is commendable that these types of quite stark findings were treated seriously by the Government. Since then, I understand—and I did visit this unit in the last recess, because we were aware that this bill was coming up, alongside our corrections spokesperson Tracey McLellan—that a number of the recommendations or a number of the areas have been addressed by some of the staff already in that unit. I do note and want to acknowledge the staff that do work in that unit. They do an incredibly hard job working with some of the most dangerous inmates in New Zealand, and I want to acknowledge the staff for the role that they do play. A reflection that I would have is that this does put some additional responsibilities on to those staff. I do recognise the changes that they have made, but this will legislate additional changes and there will need to be resourcing for that. One of the questions that I’m interested to hear from the Minister at select committee is whether there is resourcing put aside for these changes. So I think that will be important. One of the questions that remains slightly outstanding for us on this bill is the people who are put within this highly controlled unit. There’s obviously the situation of people designated as a terrorist, and I don’t think there would be much debate, in any forum, that that was the appropriate place for such people to be. Of course, I understand there are around about 16 people in this unit, at the moment, and many of those people may be more of a risk from what they can organise, rather than to safety—and so I think that that’s something that I just want to put on notice, which the Labour Party will be looking into at select committee. On the whole, though, this is a very detailed bill. There’s been a lot of work put into it. It’s been considered. I want to acknowledge that the people who are impacted by this bill have committed some horrendous crimes and there’s unlikely to be much public sympathy for them, but I do think it’s commendable as a country if those people who are under the most, probably, severe forms of public control—if we do try and make sure that the areas in which they live and they live their lives reflect our shared view of humanity. I think that that’s an important point to note, without expressing any empathy or sympathy at all to those who may be in that position. So there are some important issues to consider here. We will support this bill through to select committee. It does provide for increased human rights for these prisoners, and it does look to address some of the various serious issues that were noted in that Ombudsman report. It is a very tricky issue, and I just wanted to note, again, the incredible work that many people do in the prison system that’s very dangerous. TAMATHA PAUL (Green—Wellington Central) (15:09): Kia ora, Mr Speaker. I rise on behalf of the Green Party to speak to this bill. We will be supporting this bill to select committee, and it’s really important for us to explain why that is. The main reason we are keen to explore this bill further is because this bill establishes additional minimum entitlements to what is currently in the Act, and extends that to a wider number of people in prison. For those who aren’t aware, minimum entitlements are things like access to daylight, exercise, human contact, bedding—basically, your human rights and your human needs that you need while in custody in order to survive. They really are the bare minimum to keep people alive. We support establishing those really clearly within legislation, because Corrections do not have a good track record when it comes to honouring and fulfilling minimum entitlements in general. During the COVID-19 lockdowns, there was attention on Corrections’ inability to fulfil people’s minimum entitlements, and within a COVID context, there was maybe some flexibility afforded to them because of the circumstances and the context at the time. However, this behaviour has persisted beyond the COVID lockdowns, and we actually saw the chief executive of Corrections before the High Court at the end of last year as he was issued a mandamus order because he was not meeting his legal obligations under the Corrections Act to fulfil minimum entitlements at Auckland prison. There have been ongoing issues at Auckland prison in terms of people in that prison not being able to have their minimum entitlements met, and that has been taken to the highest level in terms of the chief executive being accountable for not meeting those entitlements. We support any establishment of those entitlements, because without this bill there would be none, in terms of what it establishes. We support that. Like the former speaker, Camilla Belich, I’ve been to the *Prisoners of Extreme Risk Unit (PERU). I did it straight away when I became an MP with the corrections portfolio. Not only have I been to PERU; I’ve spoken to psychiatrists who work in the unit. This is a unit that was established in extraordinary circumstances in order to hold, if not the worst person, one of the worst people in the history of this country in custody. That is the establishment of that unit. We understand why such a unit has to exist, and we absolutely support parts of this bill that attempt to deter or prevent any further spreading of those kinds of hateful, extremist, terrorist views that are not from here and do not belong here. I also want to point out that following the March 15th mosque attacks, there were a number of recommendations that were made by that commission around how New Zealand can combat radicalisation and terrorism, and those have not been fully enacted to this day, so, yes, this is a good step in terms of people who are held in custody and any of the materials that they might distribute while they’re alive or after their death, but I just want to note that in dealing with terrorism, there are a whole range of recommendations that sit there to this day that have not been implemented by any Governments following March 15th. I want to acknowledge the report that the Ombudsman published on PERU, and I acknowledge Peter Boshier himself, because he was really dedicated to corrections and what’s going on in our prisons and had a really good understanding and view of things. Without his report, we might not have known that there were people in PERU who were spending 900 days in prolonged solitary confinement and that this goes against so many international conventions when it comes to custody and torture experienced while people are in custody. I know that there has been a monitoring visit to New Zealand, an inspecting visit, that has looked at our prisons, our youth justice residences, jails, police cells—everywhere where custody happens—and that they are yet to report back on the findings of their visit, but I look forward to reading them. In summary, we’re supporting this to select committee. We will be exploring what it means and how we can strengthen the bill for the safety of people in Aotearoa and to crack down on terrorism and radicalisation. TODD STEPHENSON (ACT) (15:14): Thank you, Mr Speaker. I rise to speak on the Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill. As the Minister outlined, this bill does make some important changes around establishing a regime for the management of designated management of prisoners; we’ve got the expansion of the grounds for segregation; the minimum humane treatment standards, which other colleagues across the House have referred to; some new powers relating to prisoners’ property; changes to prisoners’ trust accounts; and then some other technical and operational improvements. Obviously, the Minister’s indicated this will be coming to the Justice Committee, which I’m a member of, so I look forward to working with my other colleagues on this bill, with the other bills we are looking at. Look, simply, this bill is about making sure our corrections system can deal with the reality we are facing today with some of these high-risk prisoners and the risk that they pose, both to staff and the community. Kiwis expect that when someone is behind bars, they’re not operating organisations outside the prison walls. Some of the changes this legislation makes will help close that gap. There are prisoners that pose a real risk, and we want to make sure that they are dealt with in a way that gives Corrections the powers to be able to deal with them but also does maintain some human dignity and treatment for them. I think this bill will strike the right balance. From ACT’s perspective, this is really about focusing on making sure we have a justice and corrections system that actually focuses on what matters, and that is, obviously, protecting the public, supporting the front-line staff, and making sure that all the rules regarding those who are incarcerated are clear but workable—clear but workable. That’s really, really important. I look forward to discussions around this bill and making sure our corrections system is up to standard. I’m sure there’ll be many submissions from people. I commend this bill to the House. SPEAKER: The Hon Tracey Costello. Hon CASEY COSTELLO (Minister of Customs) (15:17): Casey Costello, sir. Thank you, Mr Speaker. SPEAKER: Oh, sorry. Hon CASEY COSTELLO: I rise on behalf of New Zealand First to speak on the Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill. I’d first like to open my address by acknowledging the amazing work, in very difficult circumstances, that our corrections officers do on a daily basis. It is a challenging environment and often thankless, and I would really like to applaud and commend them for their dedication to this role. I’d also like to acknowledge my colleague Camilla Belich’s approach in this legislation. It is, as she says, very difficult to balance the conversation around this very dangerous cohort of prisoners who it is very difficult to have sympathy for, but we should be reflecting on our message as a society in ensuring that we do provide fundamental human rights and respect and dignity to those in those circumstances. I think that considered response was very useful in this discussion. It is a difficult piece of legislation to work through, but at its core, New Zealand First supports this bill because it is firmly rooted in our foundational belief that we need to protect community and country. The reality is that the prisoners that fall under this designation are a risk to our communities and to our country. The reality is that they do pose a threat even when incarcerated, and, therefore, the risk is not only to the prison staff and the prison itself and other prisoners but also to our community as a whole. The reality is that in the serious organised-crime space, we have had repeated occurrences of these prisoners continuing to operate criminal activity from this space. Then they have the ability to recruit to abhorrent ideologies, and this is something we need to protect our country and our communities from. This is a balanced piece of legislation. It will be taken to the Justice Committee, and I’m sure they will do a very robust job of ensuring that we have submissions made. This is about striking a balance to ensure that our corrections officers are protected and supported in the role they do and that the expectations and rights of these prisoners are clearly balanced with the ability to ensure we maintain safety for our communities and our country. Therefore, I commend the bill to the House. HANA-RAWHITI MAIPI-CLARKE (Te Pāti Māori—Hauraki-Waikato) (15:20): Tēnā rā koe e te Pīka, otirā tēnā rā tātou e te Whare. E tū ana ahau ki te waha i ngā kōrero mā Te Pāti Māori i te ahiahipō nei, ki tēnei o ngā pire. [Thank you, Mr Speaker; indeed, greetings to all of us in the House. I stand to give voice to statements on behalf of the Māori Party this evening regarding this particular bill.] While this bill prohibits the use of prolonged solitary confinement by introducing minimum requirements for meaningful human contact, the bill also authorises greater use of the segregation and separation of prisoners and new powers to manage prisoner trust accounts and to destroy property connected to and intended to prevent unlawful activity. Regarding Te Tiriti o Waitangi, the bill fails to recognise that the Crown must take positive steps to protect Māori, and it does not meet the Crown’s obligation of active protection. The bill has been introduced within a broader policy landscape where obligations to Te Tiriti are being undermined, narrowed, and erased. The flow-on effect of this approach is that the bill does not address, nor does it provide a targeted assessment of, impacts on Māori, despite clear evidence and advocacy by justice experts since the He Whaipaanga Hou report in 1988. The bill makes additional amendments to the Corrections Act 2004, which was recently amended in 2025 to remove explicit references to Te Tiriti. Predictably, Te Tiriti has not been revisited by the amendments proposed under this bill. Māori make up a disproportionate amount of prisoners in the current prison system. Therefore, the use of the new powers proposed under this bill is likely to have a disproportionate effect on Māori within the prison system and their whānau on the outside, who may also be subject to what are otherwise internal decisions made by managers from within prisons. It is unclear how this bill gives effect to Wai 3060, Te Rau o te Tika, the justice system kaupapa inquiry, which discussed, among other things, the treatment of Māori prisoners, prison conditions, remand practices, rehabilitation, and reintegration to date. No comprehensive Treaty-based redesign of the justice system has been committed to, and parallel legislation on sentencing prisoners and policing has passed without explicit provisions addressing that very Wai claim. The total effect of this Government’s harmful policy track record on justice compounded with Government inaction on other social determinants of crime that lead to imprisonment means that whānau will continue to fall victim to increased rates in remand and prison expansion. Evidence and expert advice to date highlight the fact that risk-based justice policies disproportionately affect both Māori inside the prison system and their whānau and communities living on the outside. Tēnā rā koe e te Pīka. TOM RUTHERFORD (National—Bay of Plenty) (15:23): I thought that the Minister made a very levelled and very fair contribution in his opening remarks on the legislation. I really want to talk about the substantive amendment in the bill, which is going to establish a really clear statutory basis for the safe, lawful, and humane management of a really small group of prisoners who pose an extreme risk to the Department of Corrections, who manage our prisons, and they are prisoners whom the bill refers to as designated-management prisoners—the DMPs. It is a really pragmatic change that the Minister has outlined as to why we are bringing this about, and, therefore, I commend it to the House. DAN ROSEWARNE (Labour) (15:23): I rise to speak on the Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill in its first reading, and, just like other members here in the House, I just want to acknowledge the work that our corrections officers do. It’s a tough job, and it’s important that we acknowledge their work. Labour will support this bill to select committee so that it can receive the detailed scrutiny that it deserves. This is a significant piece of legislation. It expands the powers of the Department of Corrections, it creates new management categories, and it alters the balance between operational control and prisoners’ rights. That means that we must examine it carefully. We approach this bill with three clear tests in mind: is it workable, is it properly resourced, and are the safeguards strong enough? Those questions matter because laws passed in this House must work not only in theory but in the reality of understaffed prisons, stretched front-line workers, and a system that is already under pressure. The first major change in this bill is the creation of a formal category of designated-management prisoners. This would apply to prisoners assessed as presenting extreme or high risks. It will allow more restrictive conditions around movement, communications, association, and property. This bill sets out a formal designation process to be led by the Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections, informed by an advisory panel. It also requires that prisoners be notified when they are being considered for designation and it allows them or their representatives to provide written information. It gives them the right to receive written reasons for a final decision, and to also seek a review. A final designation may last for up to two years. Labour acknowledges that if the State is going to impose highly restrictive regimes, then a clear legal framework is preferable to ad hoc arrangements. Transparency, reasons for decisions, and review rights are absolutely important principles, but we also recognise that this is a significant expansion of the State’s power to manage individuals outside of the standard prison regimes, and we’ll be testing whether the thresholds are appropriate, whether decisions are evidence-based, and whether there is adequate independent oversight. The second major area is segregation and restricted association. The bill rewrites and broadens the legal basis for segregation and it introduces new grounds for allowing prison managers to segregate a prisoner if they would otherwise commit an offence, recruit or radicalise others into harmful ideologies, or recruit others into organised criminal groups. Now, we understand the operational realities here. Staff must have lawful tools to manage genuine threats, but segregation is one of the most serious powers that are available inside a prison. It can have profound consequences for mental health and rehabilitation, and so Labour will be looking carefully at whether these powers are sufficiently targeted and whether they are applied consistently. We’re also keen to ensure that we do not disproportionately impact particular groups, including Māori, Pasifika, and prisoners with mental health needs, who are already overrepresented in the prison system. This bill also includes what is known as the five-day rule: treating some repeated segregation directions as one continuous period where a prisoner is removed and returned within five days. That may improve reporting and monitoring, but it also highlights the importance of having proper oversight for extended restrictive management. One of the most important aspects of this bill is the introduction of the minimum meaningful human contact requirements. This is the first legislative recognition of that concept, and Labour welcomes that principle. We know that prolonged isolation can cause real psychological harm. If rehabilitation is to mean anything, then prisons must maintain that basic human dignity. Having this bill set out a minimum of 10 hours of meaningful human contact over 14 days, with an aspirational target of 14 hours a week, is a good move, and so, overall, despite some scrutiny at the select committee, we commend this bill to the House. KATIE NIMON (National—Napier) (15:28): The Minister has covered this all very well, and I’m really pleased with where this bill has got to. Ultimately, we are in a changing environment, and we need to change the law to suit. I commend this bill to the House. Hon Dr DUNCAN WEBB (Labour—Christchurch Central) (15:29): Thank you, Mr Speaker. As Dan Rosewarne noted in his excellent speech, we do support this bill. This bill has arisen largely out of an Ombudsman’s report into conditions at the most maximum security unit at Pāremoremo and his finding, essentially, that the conditions there were inhumane. One of the real challenges for that unit was that, essentially, it was governed by administrative order, rather than by any clear legal framework. The fact that the corrections system could so significantly curtail prisoner rights, not because of something that this House had done but largely because the corrections executive thought that it was the best way to go about things, was concerning. Absolutely, the Christchurch terrorist is a dangerous person and needs to be kept in the most secure circumstances. One of the things that this bill does—and I’m not sure it does it well, but that’s for the select committee—is to, essentially, set a threshold for when people are deemed to be prisoners that need this designation of—a most serious designation. What that gets around is this facility being used, essentially, as a holding pen or an overflow pen when the prison muster is a bit high or people being put there because they’ve been difficult or because they’ve got connections within this prison or that prison that are not helpful. It’s entirely appropriate that the threshold for designation is high, because the kind of conditions that people are put in are very challenging indeed. That’s the other thing that this bill does, which I think is a good thing, which the Corrections Act generally doesn’t do, which is talk about meaningful human contact. We have constraints on solitary confinement, but actually having interactions with people, meaningful interactions, is kind of a human necessity. I mean, we are a social animal—I think was Aristotle who said that. The provision for, I think it’s 14 hours a week is modest, but it’s something. The idea that there will be those kinds of benefits extended to these prisoners—even though it’s actually quite hard to manage, even though you might have to do it with corrections officers present to ensure that nothing goes awry—it’s a good thing. At the end of the day—actually, the minimum is 10 hours, and 14 is the aspiration, but of course we know that in Corrections, when resources are strained, as they very much are at the current time, aspirations are rarely achieved. But, ultimately, this is about public safety. The other important thing with this bill is that the designation can be reviewed. It’s not a put them in this most significant security setting and that’s it forever. If circumstances change, which mean that that security designation is no longer appropriate, then it is possible for that to be reviewed and for the prisoner to be put back into maximum security or some other setting. What this essentially is is putting into the law a set of rules to more carefully prescribe what Corrections can do, rather than leaving it up to the administrative discretion of the corrections system and corrections officers and, ultimately, prison managers. That’s got to be a good thing. Now, whether we’ve got it quite right, that’s absolutely a matter for the select committee. We do need to have a good look at that, because it’s important to make sure, particularly the designation, that the test for designation is an appropriate one. That’s what we’ll be doing at select committee. I look forward to it. But making sure we’ve got some rules around prisoner conditions in the most extreme settings is a good thing. Dr VANESSA WEENINK (National—Banks Peninsula) (15:34): Thank you, Mr Speaker. I rise in support of the Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill. This bill has had very wide support across the House, and I also add my support. I commend the bill to the House. A party vote was called for on the question, That the Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill be now read a first time. Ayes 117 New Zealand National 49; New Zealand Labour 34; Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand 15; ACT New Zealand 11; New Zealand First 8. Noes 6 Te Pāti Māori 5; Ferris. Motion agreed to. Bill read a first time.

Documents and supporting material