Parliament bill
Public Finance (Prohibition on Providing Public Funds to Gangs) Amendment Bill
- Last checked
- July 15, 2026 15:48
- Source captured
- July 15, 2026 15:48
- Source
- View on Parliament.nz
What this bill does
The bill passed its first reading 101–21; the vote was not unanimous. According to the bill’s explanatory material, organisations run by or associated with gangs can currently receive Crown funding, including indirectly through public funds. The bill aims to stop public money reaching gangs. The bill would bar the Crown from paying money directly or indirectly to a gang, unless another Act expressly allows it, and require reasonable precautions and due diligence. It would also make knowingly making money available to a gang without reasonable excuse an offence.
AI-assisted summary based on the bill text and linked Hansard debates.
Latest voting result
May 20, 2026Ayes 101 · Noes 21
- National Party Aye · 48 votes
- Labour Party Aye · 34 votes
- ACT Party Aye · 11 votes
- NZ First Party Aye · 8 votes
- Green Party No · 15 votes
- Te Pāti Māori No · 4 votes
- Ferris, Tākuta No
- Kapa-Kingi, Mariameno No
Arguments raised in Parliament
AI-assisted summary of the linked Hansard debates. Each point is grounded in the cited transcript.
Arguments for
The Crown would be required to conduct due diligence and people who knowingly facilitate gang payments could face offences, which supporters say would prevent public money reaching gangs through intermediaries.
Preventing seized criminal proceeds from returning to the offenders through later programmes would stop gangs from receiving effectively laundered public funding.
Redirecting money away from criminal organisations would leave public funds available for other services, including health and education.
The prohibition would stop Crown agencies funding groups run by or strongly affiliated with gangs, which proponents say would close the loophole exposed by the Mongrel Mob-linked funding.
Arguments against
The bill’s ban on direct or indirect payments is drafted broadly enough that it could deny student support or welfare payments to gang members or their family members, including people trying to pursue education.
A sweeping indirect-funding prohibition could obstruct Government-funded addiction treatment and programmes that divert people from gang membership, weakening efforts to reduce gang harm.
Implementation is uncertain because there is no stated test for deciding who is a gang member, making it difficult to apply a funding prohibition fairly.
The Green Party argued that a zero-tolerance approach may increase distrust, gang membership, and isolation rather than address gang-caused harm.
Nuance and qualifications
Labour’s stated position was that the prohibition should be narrowed to direct Crown grants to organisations meaningfully connected to gangs, rather than broadly affecting associated individuals or families.
The bill is not framed as an unconditional ban, because payments expressly authorised by another Act would remain possible.
Bill text
Public Finance (Prohibition on Providing Public Funds to Gangs) Amendment BillVersion published April 02, 2026 00:00.
Hansard
May 20, 2026Public Finance (Prohibition on Providing Public Funds to Gangs) Amendment Bill — Referral to Select Committee · Full day report